Mass Effect 2: Struggling to Understand

Mass Effect 2:

The wreck of the Normandy in Mass Effecf 2The two game franchises I’ve seen most hyped in recent times are Portal and Mass Effect. Amazingly, Portal pretty much lived up to its insane hype. Mass Effect… not so much.

ME2 is not a bad game; I’ll say that out of the gate. I will be harsh to it in this blog, but that doesn’t reflect my full feelings. It’s a solid six or seven out of ten — okay, not great.

But I am left struggling to understand what people love so much about this game. And I think I do, but at the same time, I don’t.

Saving the best for last:

Investigating the Collectors in Mass Effect 2The main problem with ME2 is that it is incredibly slow in getting started. It takes an eternity to get your squad together, and for the most part, I found this part of the game very dull. I honestly can’t remember a single recruitment mission that I enjoyed.

For that matter, I can’t remember many recruitment missions period. They all kind of fade into a blur; there was the one where I fought mercs, the one where I fought mercs, and also the one where I fought mercs.

The loyalty missions were a bit better, though still repetitive. Amazing how everyone in my crew got betrayed by someone they love. But some, namely Mordin’s and Tali’s, were actually quite engaging and ethically weighty, despite their predictability.

Still, the entire grind of recruitment and then loyalty missions ultimately felt very much like busywork — and a lot of it at that.

The Citadel in Mass Effect 2However, once I got all those done and had my whole crew ready, I started enjoying the game a lot more. I’d describe it as a quantum leap forward in entertainment value. I spent hours chatting with the crew on all manner of subjects. I particularly enjoyed my conversations with Mordin and Thane — dear God, those guys are awesome.

And then we launched our epic assault on the Collectors, and I had to make heart-breaking decisions over who would live and who would die. Although I resent the unpredictability of which of my decisions would lead to people dying, it was on the whole an enjoyable experience.

But here’s the problem: that part after the game got going, where things were actually interesting? It was about 10% of the total time I spent playing ME2 — I did the math. The rest was just building the crew, doing side missions, and grinding for resources. If all the busywork had been cut out of this game, it would have been as long as the original Portal.

The Normandy crash site in Mass Effect 2Ultimately, it’s the same problem suffered by Diablo, World of Warcraft, and frankly any RPG I’ve ever played outside the Dungeon Siege franchise: it’s a huge amount of grinding and time-sinks for brief, if stellar, rewards.

What could have been:

So I sort of understand what people love about this game. A lot of the characters are very interesting and memorable once you finally get far enough to properly interact with them, and the main plot — while not especially original — was plenty exciting.

But yet, those good parts were a pretty small part of the game, so I don’t understand why it’s viewed as such a masterpiece. It could have been, but the execution was badly botched.

The Collector ship attacking a colony in Mass Effect 2It saddens me greatly because I can easily see how it could have been worthy of the hype if it had just been executed a little better.

Recruitment missions and loyalty missions should not have been separate things, and there ought to have been more variety to them so it’s not always “kill mercs to recruit them, then help them deal with the friend/family member who betrayed them.”

It also would have helped a lot if the loyalty/recruitment missions had been connected to the main plot. The game would have had a much greater sense of purpose if everyone on the crew had lost someone to or suffered as a result of the Collectors, or the Reapers.

Maybe the Cerberus experiments on Jack could have been a response to the Reaper threat. Maybe Miranda’s father could have created her to fight the Reapers — now there would have been a twist; she escaped him only to end up serving the purpose he originally intended for her. Maybe Jacob’s father could have been shot down in a Collector raid.

Inside the Collector ship in Mass Effect 2With the rest of the game streamlined, the Collector arc could have been expanded and given the attention it deserved. It ended up feeling like an afterthought, almost. So little of the game was devoted to actually fighting them.

Make those changes, fill a few of the more obvious plot holes, and add an option to know if a character has new conversation options without actually going to talk to them, and suddenly you have a game that would be worthy of all the hype.

But unfortunately, what we’re stuck with ends up being a very average game. There are tantalizing flashes of brilliance, but they feel lost amidst hours of slaughtering mercs and scanning planet after planet cause I could never find one with any frickin’ element zero. There was the potential for so much more.

Voice Acting in Games: Why It’s Good to Be Bad

Voice acting in games:

World of Warcraft and other Blizzard games are famous — or perhaps infamous — for their hammy, over-the-top voice acting. Love it or hate it, you can’t forget it. We’ve all heard the memes: “THE WILL OF THE TEMPLAR IS STRONGER,” “BETRAAAAAAAAAAAAYS YOU,” and such.

Suffer, mortals, as your pathetic magic BETRAYS you!Many people criticize it, and sometimes, it can be pretty bad, but I believe there is method to Blizzard’s madness, and recent events have strengthened this belief.

I’ve swallowed my dislike for Bioware and picked up a copy of Mass Effect II — starting halfway through the trilogy because Bioware never bothered to make the original compatible with the most modern operating systems. I was tired of wondering what everyone was raving about. I plan a more detailed post on it once I finish the whole game, but for now, the voice acting is one issue that stands out to me.

Bioware’s voice acting is pretty much the opposite extreme from Blizzard’s. It’s down to earth and realistic to the point of bordering on the dull.

Some characters have memorable voices, but they’re the exception, and even the most passionate characters seem almost incapable of displaying emotion most of the time. I find it’s seriously hurting my ability to enjoy the game, and it shows me my hunch about video game voice acting was correct.

My version of Commander Shepard in Mass Effect 2You see, the thing about video games is that most don’t have the graphical technology to show facial expressions, and even those that do generally can’t get it right. ME2 has the best graphics I’ve ever seen by a wide margin, but even so, I cringe at the uncanny valley rictus that is Miranda Lawson smiling.

So video games need to rely on other methods to convey emotion, and voice acting is by far the best way to do that.

But normal conversational tones don’t convey enough feeling on their own without expressions to back them up. Thus, you need to dial the emotion up to eleven to get the point across. I liken it to how stage actors have traditionally worn masks or makeup to exaggerate their expressions so that even those seated far away can see them.

And this is where Mass Effect’s voice acting tends to fall flat. By trying to make their dialogue realistic, Bioware is instead making it seem dull and lifeless. I want my Shepard to scream and rage at the Illusive Man, but all she does is sound kind of frustrated, at best.

And I know it’s not the actress’s fault, because Jennifer Hale also voiced Leah in Diablo III and did a stellar job, infusing each and every one of her lines with life and personality. It’s merely a directing issue. Bioware took the wrong path in its voice acting decisions.

Leah in the Black Soulstone cinematic in Diablo 3I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the only characters in ME2 I find compelling right now are Mordin and Thane — both individuals with very unusual voices and/or speech patterns.

So I think Blizzard’s hammy, occasionally ridiculous voice acting is a lot closer to the ideal for a video game.

Not to say it’s perfect, of course. They do have a tendency to go overboard, and I certainly won’t defend “BETRAAAAAAAAAAAAYS YOU.” But certainly characters like Zanzil and Kormac would not be nearly so fun without their exaggerated voices. You can actually hear Kormac grin when he says, “I tried to count how many we’ve killed… but I’ve lost track.”

Take as an example one of the most popular WoW patch trailers, Gods of Zul’Aman. The universal love for this trailer basically comes to down to just one thing: the voice actor playing Zul’jin.

He obviously got into the role. Ten thousand years of inborn hatred seethes from every word he utters. I can just picture him spitting into the mic in the recording booth as he rants. It is, in a word, awesome.

Now, if they’d told him to be just a little more sedate, a bit more grounded and realistic in his voice acting, this would just be a generic trailer for an unremarkable raid from way back in Burning Crusade, instead of one of the most beloved WoW cinematics.

Blizzard games aren’t the only example of this, either. The Portal games were also a great illustration of how making your voice-overs a bit larger than life can improve a game.

And so if nothing else, Mass Effect has given me a key insight into what makes a good game. I now feel confident my hunch was correct and that voice acting in games needs to be a little flamboyant, a little ridiculous, to be effective.

…It occurs to me I just said WoW is better than Mass Effect in at least one area. I’m about to be lynched, aren’t I?

New article

My latest WhatMMO article is on MMO rites of passage. How was I supposed to know you don’t use arcane spells as a frost mage?