Reviews: The Warcraft Chronicle, Vol. 1, and The StarCraft Field Manual

Following the success of Diablo’s Book of Cain and Book of Tyrael, Blizzard has began producing similarly lavish lore books for their other franchises. Warcraft gets the Chronicle, which will be spread out over several volumes, and StarCraft so far has only been given the StarCraft Field Manual.

Cover art for the Warcraft Chronicle, volume oneOf course you just knew I’d be on these like stink on a monkey.

The Warcraft Chronicle:

The Warcraft Chronicle represents an attempt to streamline, clarify, and unify all of Warcraft lore to date — an ambitious effort considering what a morass of retcons and scattered storylines Warcraft has become over the years.

Volume one covers the entire history of the Warcraft universe from the beginning of time up until just before the opening of the Dark Portal, and much of it covers periods of history we have previously had little to no knowledge of.

All this is helped along by some incredibly beautiful and detailed artwork depicting major events and locations, many of which we have never seen before, such as the Black Empire, ancient Zandalar, and Zin’Azshari at its height. The art of the Warcraft Chronicle is absolutely fantastic and probably the best reason to get the book.

As for the story content of the book… well, I’m still digesting it.

There are a lot of very big revelations in this book. Some are retcons, others just new info. A lot of what the Chronicle talks about is epic, thrilling, and fascinating in the way Warcraft lore is at its best, but it does change a lot of things, and it will be a while before I fully decide how I feel about it all.

The Black Empire, as depicted by the Warcraft ChronicleIt is good to finally get a clear and ordered history of things and try to clear up the vagaries and contradictions that have cropped up over the years. This will likely benefit the story going forward.

On the other hand, sometimes a little mystery is a good thing, and having an answer to (nearly) every question can rob the universe of some of its mystique. I do think knowing exactly where the Old Gods came from and what their goal is robs them of some of their intimidation factor. They’re not these terrible, incomprehensible enigmas anymore.

Still, even with my mixed feelings, I’d consider the Chronicle a must have for Warcraft lore fans.

Overall rating: 7.5/10

The StarCraft Field Manual:

Unfortunately StarCraft’s lore tome proves less impressive.

The Field Manual is presented as an actual manual given to Dominion marines to help them understand the threats of the Koprulu Sector.

The entire manual is “enhanced” by comments scribbled into the margins by the manual’s original owner. This is a clever idea in theory but fairly annoying in practice. Terran marines are not known for their wit or insight.

A page from the StarCraft Field ManualAnd unlike the Chronicle, the Field Manual does not offer any major new insights into the lore. Mostly it’s just a series of blurbs describing the backstories of the various units and buildings, similar to what they had in the old game manuals. Which is all well and good, but I’m not sure it quite justifies the book’s relatively high price tag.

The artwork is nice, but nothing compared to that of the Chronicle. Really my favourite part of the book was a chart offering to-scale size comparisons of most units. Turns out the Spear of Adun is seventy-four kilometers long.

Them Protoss don’t mess around.

Overall rating: 5.5/10 Only worth it for collectors and extreme super fans.

Gaming: The Love/Hate Developers

If you’ve followed this blog for a while, you’ll note that there are some game developers towards which I have, shall we say, very intense feelings. You’ll often see me going on epic rants about their blunders or casually putting them down. Yet paradoxically I’ll play virtually anything these companies produce, and I remain rabidly passionate about their games. It could be pretty confusing to a reader.

A vision of the Xel'naga keystone in StarCraft 2: Legacy of the VoidFor all their flaws, though, each of these developers brings something special to the world of gaming, something exquisite that keeps me coming back for more. I thought it would be interesting to look at these companies and explain why I am so loyal to them, despite everything.

Up until relatively recently, only one developer would have fit his category, but these days the number has grown. No prizes for guessing that the original is…

Blizzard Entertainment:

I have been playing Blizzard games since before I knew how to spell my own name, and they remain a company to whom I am so loyal that I often joke they “own my soul.”

But that doesn’t mean I think they’re perfect. Far from it. In fact, they faceplant with alarming regularity, and their games are almost never without some significant flaw.

I think Blizzard’s brilliance and their blunders both stem from the same source: passion.

The Heart of Fear in World of WarcraftHave you ever seen Chris Metzen talk about the games he’s worked on? He’s the living embodiment of childlike joy and enthusiasm. He has so much passion for Blizzard’s games it’s like he could spontaneously combust at any moment.

And I think that’s true of all of Blizzard to some extent. They love games. They love making games. They have fantastic passion for everything they do.

And therein lies their folly. I think much of Blizzard’s mistakes come from them being so caught up in their passion and excitement that they don’t take the time to pause and think if what they’re doing is really a good idea.

I think that’s how we got the trainwreck that is Warlords of Draenor. They thought, “Hey, I bet it’d be cool to bring back all the old Horde characters,” and never considered much beyond that. If they had, they would have realized what a powerfully dumb idea that is.

I don’t know if this preference for passion over common sense can explain every one of Blizzard’s mistakes, but I think it’s one of their most core flaws and the reason why their plots are often a bit shallow, their continuity nonexistent, and their games rough around the edges.

The bridge of the Spear of Adun in StarCraft II: Legacy of the VoidBut that same passion is what makes their games irresistible. Blizzard are so colourful, so larger than life, so bombastic and beautiful and unabashedly fun that nothing else can compete. I often say that Blizzard games may be popcorn movies, but they are the absolute best popcorn movies around.

Their passion means that when Blizzard gets something right, they get it so right. Legacy of the Void was a breathtakingly epic experience and an absolute joy from beginning to end. Ditto for Reign of Chaos, Reaper of Souls, and to a lesser extent Wrath of the Lich King and Mists if Pandaria.

At their best, Blizzard games are the perfect embodiment of the entire concept of “superior realities” that this blog is based on, an utterly engrossing vacation from anything resembling the real world.

Bioware:

I’ve often said that Bioware makes great choose your own adventure novels, but no one told them they’re a video game company. This is my way of saying that they’re good at story-telling, but that they seem to put no real effort into compelling gameplay.

Of all the Bioware games I’ve played, Inquisition is the only one where I’d list the combat and general game mechanics as a mark in the game’s favour. And even then, Inquisition’s combat isn’t great. It’s just decent. And I’m not sure I’d feel so good about if knight-enchanters hadn’t been so crazy overpowered.

My agent at work in her stronghold in Star Wars: The Old RepublicThat leaves story-telling as Bioware’s strength, but even that isn’t entirely true. The main storylines in Bioware games are, at best, hit and miss. The only ones that really impressed me on that front are Dragon Age 2 and Mass Effect 3 (yeah, I’m a freak). Origins’ story was just weak, Inquisition and ME2 had potential but became entirely too bogged down with irrelevant side missions, and ME1’s story was okay but not exactly mind-blowing.

Bioware is also, ironically, one of the worst developers out there for marrying story and gameplay. As in they don’t even try. The story is told through scripted cutscenes that are entirely divorced from the actual gameplay. Game mechanics are almost never used to heighten or enhance the story being told. Part of the reason I was so impressed with Inquisition’s Trespasser DLC was because they finally did start using game mechanics to enhance the story (IE the mark going crazy).

However, there are two things about Bioware games that are truly special.

One is the choices they offer. Even if Bioware’s stories aren’t always stellar, they’re engaging because it’s your story. There’s a tremendous satisfaction to being able to react as you choose to the situations the game throws at you, and it allows you to become so much more deeply invested than you otherwise might be.

I was reflecting recently that I almost never make the “evil” choices in games, but I’m glad they exist, because it makes the “good” choices feel far more meaningful. Sometimes being the hero isn’t about saving the world so much as it is about simply not clicking the button that says, “[Torture him]”.

My Shepard in Mass Effect 3It appeals to me as a writer, too. All the hard work of building a world and characters is done for me, and I can go nuts telling the story I want to.

Even then the choice system is often very imperfect. If I had a nickel for every time in a Bioware game I made the wrong choice because of a misunderstanding…

But very few games offer this kind of experience on this scale, so Bioware kind of has a monopoly.

The other thing Bioware does better than anyone else is creating amazing characters.

I’ve often tried to explain to non-gamers in my life what the characters in Bioware games are like, but words can’t do it justice. They feel real enough to reach out and touch. Going back and replaying a game feels like a family reunion. I genuinely miss talking to characters like Sera, or Tali, or Thane, or Merrill.

That’s not to say I always like the characters in Bioware games. In fact, every game has had at least one cast member I’d happily shove down a flight of stairs: Alistair, Isabela, Vivienne, Zaeed, Jack, Kaliyo…

NOT ONE WORD, DWARF.But even there, the depth of hatred I have for these characters speaks to their quality and realness.

Dontnod:

It might be a bit early to add Dontnod to the list, since they’ve only put out two games so far, but already they have all the makings of another company I love and hate in equal measure.

Life Is Strange and Remember Me were both brilliant games with serious flaws. On the whole, I found Remember Me was good enough to forgive the flaws, but Life Is Strange not so much. I know the general consensus is the other way around.

But what I respect is that both were games with big ideas, big ambitions. They tried to not only be good video games, but works of art, as well, and largely succeeded, despite their stumbles. I’d rather games that shoot for the stars and fall a little short.

The Saint-Michal District of Neo-Paris in Remember MeI’m already kind of excited about Vampyr, and I don’t even like vampire fiction.