Review: Dragon Age: Inquisition

I desperately want to make a Monty Python joke here, but it’s already been done so many times that I would just feel like a hack.

My inquisitor with Solas and Cassandra in Dragon Age: InquisitionFirstly, let me say that Inquisition is probably the single biggest and most content-packed single-player game I’ve ever played. Half the MMOs I’ve tried don’t feel this vast or overwhelming.

As of this writing, I have spent more time playing Inquisition than Mass Effect 3, despite the fact that I played through Inquisition once and I’ve finished ME3 three separate times. And ME3 was a pretty big game.

That sheer scale makes this a difficult game to review because there’s just so much to talk about, but I’ll try and put this all down in something resembling a coherent order.

Overhauls and improvements:

Out of the gate, I felt that Inquisition was a huge improvement over previous Dragon Age games.

I’ve often said that Bioware makes awesome choose your own adventure novels, but no one ever told them they’re a game developer. Inquisition is the first game of theirs I’ve played that’s actually, well, a game.

My inquisitor showing off her skills as a knight-enchanter against a dragon in Dragon Age: InquisitionFirstly, auto-attack is gone, and thank God for that. Auto-attack has no place in a single-player game — it’s questionable whether even MMOs should have it at this point. The only virtue it ever had was compensating for slow Internet connections back before high-speed Internet was common place.

So for the first time in the franchise, combat is something the player actively engages in rather than a glorified QuickTime event where you just watch the game play itself.

That is a very, very good thing.

There are some other subtle changes to combat, as well. Boss fights feel a bit more complex, with varied and interesting mechanics. Dragon fights, in particular, are epic and thrilling struggles — it’s just a shame the game didn’t include more encounters like that.

Oh, and you can throw jars of bees at people.

Jars of bees.

Also, the tiny and ultra-linear maps we’re familiar with from previous Mass Effect and Dragon Age games are gone, replaced with vast and largely non-linear zones and sprawling dungeons.

My inquisitor riding her Pride of Arlathan stag mount in Dragon Age: InquisitionInitially, I enjoyed this a lot. It’s great to be able to just ride off in any direction and find something to do, and the zones are absolutely overflowing with quests, lore, and goodies. It’s overwhelming at times.

Playing Inquisition reminded me of nothing so much as a single-player version of Guild Wars 2. There’s the same sense of exploration, the same ability to go in any direction and find some activity almost immediately.

I found this very liberating.

And you can jump now. As a proud jump-spammer, I welcomed this.

But you may have noticed I’m using the past tense a lot.

Quantity over quality:

Unfortunately, while Inquisition feels like an MMO in many positive ways, it also becomes clear after a while that it has inherited the bad habits of its multiplayer cousins, as well. Specifically, a preference for breadth over depth, quantity over quality, and busywork over memorable experiences.

My party in Dragon Age: InquisitionAs with ME2 and Origins, this is Sidequest: The Game.* The main and character storylines — the whole reason anyone in their right mind plays a Bioware game — became something of an afterthought compared with picking flowers, sightseeing, collecting shards, putting together mosaics, and other random tasks.

*(This phrase shamelessly stolen from one of my readers.)

A shocking number of quests are just bland kill and collect tasks with nothing but a short text intro, such as you would see in your average WoW clone MMO — which is even more surprising coming from a company whose MMO sold itself on its lack of text-based questing.

The same endless potential for exploration that initially delighted me eventually began to feel more like a burden. There is very little variation other than cosmetic differences between the many zones, and they all start to feel the same after a while. There are a few exceptions — such as the Fallow Mire, a thoroughly enjoyable zone featuring several unique mechanics such as undead rising to attack you if you ever touch a body of water — but mostly it just felt like repeating the same tasks endlessly.

Infinite exploration is only a good thing if you can consistently provide the player with new and interesting things to discover. Otherwise, each new zone ceases to be an exciting new frontier and instead becomes a checklist of chores to complete.

This still isn’t as bad as it could have been. The gameplay improvements kept things at least somewhat interesting — I don’t think I could have even finished the game if it was still using the mechanics from Origins.

The armies of the Inquisition in Dragon Age: InquisitionBut certainly this is a game that was longer than it needed to be. I’m of the opinion most games these days are too short, but padding things out with mountains of busywork isn’t an improvement.

Character, story, world:

The character and story elements — the real meat of the game — also seemed to take a step backwards in Inquisition. The ability to tell when a character has new dialogue options  — one of the best innovations of Dragon Age 2 — is gone, bringing back the need to visit every single one and check for yourself.

The character development is also surprisingly weak for a Bioware game. There is much less character-specific content than I’ve grown used to, and many characters feel sadly underdeveloped. Iron Bull, especially, is a huge case of wasted potential — no pun intended.

The writing seems a bit dodgy in places, as well. Sera’s inconsistency I can accept because I think that’s sort of the point of Sera, but I don’t think Cassandra was supposed to be bipolar, yet that’s how she came across. Half the time she hates my guts, and the other half the time she thinks I’m the most awesomest person ever, and there’s no apparent rhyme or reason for the shifts.

The shame is that a lot of the characters are very interesting. I wanted to learn more about them, but I just didn’t get the chance.

My inquisitor and Sera in Dragon Age: InquisitionOn the plus side, this does show that the characters were mostly of a high quality. Dorian, Solas, and Sera were my favourites — each of them thoroughly awesome in a different way — but Iron Bull, Blackwall, Varric, and Cole were also quite enjoyable.

There are even some weighty contributions from characters from the past games — including some that totally surprised me — and those were very cool, if a bit bizarre in some cases. Meeting your in-game son — except he’s not your son because you’re playing a different character this game — is weird as all Hell.

I do regret we didn’t get to see Anders, Merrill, or Fenris again, though.

The main storyline was mainly enjoyable yet also oddly disappointing. Mostly, it feels unfinished. It deals with all sorts of incredibly important things related to the very foundations of Thedan history, but most of the questions raised by it are left unanswered, and the feeling the game left me with was less “Wow!” and more “Huh?”

The villain is probably the coolest and scariest antagonist Bioware has yet produced, but his role in the game is infinitesimally small, and it’s another case of what feels like wasted potential.

And the ending was stupendously underwhelming. I just kind of sat there thinking, “That’s it? Seriously? Did I miss something?”

Corypheus in Dragon Age: InquisitionOn the plus side, while I didn’t feel quite as free to do as I choose as I did in DA2, I was able to have a lot of control over the direction of the world, and I was mostly able to achieve the goals I set myself at the outset. Life in Thedas is now much better for mages and Elves and much worse for Templars and Chantry traditionalists. That’s a good feeling.

As always, there are still some issues with story decisions being more obtuse than they ought to be. This time, I accidentally got my whole clan killed. I guess the Inquisition is my clan now…

On the aesthetic front… Well, I feel like I should be heaping praise on Inquisition’s stunning, ultra-realistic graphics, but despite their obvious beauty and technical splendour, I found myself vaguely underwhelmed by the game’s visuals.

They made things so realistic that the graphics lost any semblance of style or personality, and Inquisition suffers from the same problem as Origins: Every single environment looks like it could have come from any high fantasy setting anywhere ever. By comparison, Kirkwall was a setting that exuded a very distinctive history and personality.

On the other hand, the music is fantastic. I’m almost tempted to upgrade to the deluxe edition just to get the soundtrack.

Bugs (and I don’t just mean the jars of bees):

A bizarre bug in Dragon Age: Inquisition

Most of the bugs weren’t this hilarious.

One other thing needs to be mentioned before I wrap up this review, and that is that Inquisition is a surprisingly buggy, unstable, and unpolished game, especially for such a big budget title.

Bugs are extremely common and run the gamut from the minor and hilarious to the catastrophic. The game crashes frequently, and there are all kinds of minor hiccups and irritants. There was a mystery quest marked on the mini-map but never found. Sometimes the landscape randomly turned neon green. The list goes on.

Even when it wasn’t bugging out, the game often ran sluggishly or with an excess of lag, despite my having a very powerful computer and not even running it at the highest settings.

That’s really not acceptable, especially for such a prestigious brand as Dragon Age.

* * *

On the whole, I did enjoy my time with Inquisition, but after over a hundred hours and nearly a month, I’m kind of glad it’s over, and as much as I would love to experience the game as a different class and/or while making different choices, I’m not sure I’ll ever have the patience to play it again.

My party in Dragon Age: InquisitionOverall rating: 7.3/10 As with all previous Dragon Age titles, Inquisition could have been an amazing game but fell just a little short of the mark, and despite some major improvements, I didn’t find it as satisfying as Dragon Age II.

I really miss Merrill.

Recommended Reading for World Spectrum Fans

The World Spectrum series is finished (for now, anyway). But perhaps some of you are still hungry for more — I hope you are; shows I’ve done my job right. If that’s the case, you might want to check out some other books with similar concepts and themes to my science fantasy epics.

Books of the World Spectrum bannerThis is one of the the nice things about being an author. I’m not really in direct competition with other writers. You’ve got plenty of time to read books from a variety of people.

The following is a list of books I’ve greatly enjoyed that also are similar to and/or served as inspiration for my World Spectrum novels.

And if you’re already fan of some or all of these but haven’t yet read the World Spectrum, maybe this is a sign you should give it a try. It’s free, after all.

The Three Worlds Cycle by Ian Irvine:

Ian Irvine is my favourite modern writer, and my literary idol. I can only aspire to one day be half the writer he is, and he is one of my greatest sources of inspiration.

If you read his Three Worlds Cycle, you’ll immediately notice similarities to my own work. A major plot element of the first quartet, The View From the Mirror, is a mysterious magical barrier separating the three worlds. The worlds themselves bear a certain resemblance to mine, as well: an Earth-like world where most of the action takes place (Barria/Santhenar), an icy world (Sy’om/Aachan), and a heavily forested world (Tyzu/Tallallame).

Cover art for "The Well of Echoes, book one: Geomancer" by Ian IrvineIrvine spent most of his life as a scientist, and that shows in his writing. He has a very realistic and logical approach to fantasy that’s routed more in science than mysticism. I’m a huge fan of this as it makes the universe feel much more grounded and believable, without sacrificing the wonder and exoticism of high fantasy, and I tried to replicate this as much as possible with the World Spectrum novels.

The second quartet of the Three Worlds Cycle, The Well of Echoes, takes the science fantasy angle even further with many wondrous and terrible magical devices. Most notably, the massive war machines known as Clankers were a major inspiration for my own Automatons.

The Dragon Age by James Maxey:

When I think of science fantasy, James Maxey’s Dragon Age series is always one of the first thing that comes to mind. The reason why constitutes something of a spoiler, so if you like to go into books fresh, just skip ahead to the next entry on this list and take my word for it that the series is worth reading.

The Dragon Age novels start out seeming like fairly standard high fantasy fare. They are set in a world of dragons and magicians, where ordinary humans are nothing but slaves and prey.

But it is eventually revealed that it is not a fantasy setting at all, but a work of post-apocalyptic sci-fi. The dragons are the result of a Jurassic Park-esque genetic engineering experiment gone horribly wrong, and the “magic” is actually nano-technology left over from the fallen human civilization.

Cover art for "Dragon Age, book one: Bitterwood" by James MaxeyIt makes for a pretty interesting setting, and it gets pretty strange (in a good way) as the series goes on and the sci-fi angle becomes more pronounced. If you’re someone who likes to mix and match sci-fi and fantasy, this a series worth your time.

Shadows of the Apt by Adrian Tchaikovsky:

You want a good steampunk story with fantasy elements? You want Shadows of the Apt. It’s just that simple.

This is another series that interestingly blends the scientific with the fantastical. Much of the story, especially in the early novels, focuses on steampunk technologies and fictional science. Most of the main characters don’t even believe in magic.

But as the series advances, more and more elements of the fantastical slip in. Unlike Ian Irvine’s realistic take on magic, Tchaikovsky’s magic is rooted in mysticism and the unknowable. It’s a stark contrast to the gritty technology of the rest of the setting, and the utterly disparate forces of science and magic make for a very compelling and unusual universe.

Genesis of Shannara by Terry Brooks:

Terry Brooks’ massive Shannara series is in many ways a typical high fantasy, but it does have one major twist. Rather than being set in an alternate world or the distant past, it’s actually set on Earth in the distant future. For the most part, this is a background element of the story that doesn’t come up much, but the Genesis of Shannara trilogy puts the idea front and center.

Cover art for "Genesis of Shannara, book one: Armageddon's Children" by Terry BrooksGenesis of Shannara tells the story of how the modern world we know was destroyed, and how it gave birth to the fantastical world of the other Shannara books. It’s a brilliant genre mash-up combining elements of urban fantasy, post-apocalyptic sci-fi, and high fantasy.

This is a series that has pretty much everything. Burned out cities. Hordes of zombie-like Once-men. Mutants. Two kinds of demons. Elves. Magical artifacts. A wizard driving a weaponized Hummer. A spirit dog named after the most Sith-like vice president in U.S. history.

A combination of so many disparate elements might seem scattered or ridiculous, but somehow, Terry Brooks makes it all work together beautifully, without ever forgetting the importance of emotion or character.

While Genesis of Shannara is both a prequel to the other Shannara novels and a sequel to Brooks’ Word and Void novels, you don’t need much knowledge of either series to appreciate it. Even if you’ve never read anything by Terry Brooks before, I’d highly recommend this series.