Do You Have An Ideal RPG Character?

Over the past year or so, I’ve played several games that give you pretty much free reign to create whatever character you want. The Secret World and Fable: The Lost Chapters both allow you to create pretty much any ability set (within reason), and Aion and Guild Wars 2 are both games that allow nearly limitless appearance customization.

My thief in the Guild Wars 2 betaAnd as I’ve played these games, certain patterns have begun to arise. There are certain themes that keep coming up over and over when I’m given the freedom to create whatever character I wish.

This has led me to wonder whether I, and other people, have an “ideal” RPG character that we will always gravitate towards creating if we have the chance. And if so, why are these traits our ideals?

There are two sides to this: appearance and abilities.

Appearance:

My rogue and her "srs" faceWhile I do play and enjoy characters with other looks, there is one look that keeps coming up over and over. If you’re a regular reader, you’re probably used to it by now: a tough-looking woman with an athletic, muscular build and black hair tied back in a ponytail. I’ve also occasionally dabbled with tough-looking women with tied back white hair.

Examples of these include my World of Warcraft rogue, my other WoW rogue, my Guild Wars 2 thief, my GW2 mesmer, and my Templar in The Secret World. If we add those with white hair, the list also includes my WoW warlock, my GW2 thief from the beta, and my ranger in Aion.

This all began with my rogue in Warcraft. I chose to make her tough-looking because, well, she’s a killer. I’m not sure why I always go for black hair, but the ponytail is because I wanted a style where her hair wouldn’t get in her eyes while she’s stabbing people.

Similar reasoning also applies to why I choose athletic builds in games where body customization is possible. My characters are fighters; they should look the part.

My character in Aion, an Asmodian rangerI also tend to make my characters tall when given the chance. The reasoning for this is simple to understand. Despite being of normal height for a white male, I’ve always felt oddly inadequate about my height and wished I was taller.

As for why I keep playing women… that’s more complicated. I’ve already talked about that in some detail, but I suspect I still don’t have all the answers.

Abilities:

I first started thinking about this when I spent a week playing Fable: The Lost Chapters about a year ago. This was by no means a particularly good game, but one thing I did appreciate was the utter freedom of character design. You can pretty much be whatever you want.

I went into this game with no plan. I just did whatever seemed like a good idea at the time and progressed as felt natural. This makes my Fable character possibly the truest expression of what my ideal playstyle would be.

My warlock posing in the Jade ForestSo what was my Fable hero? A great, hulking, plate-wearing, greatsword-wielding, fireball-hurling battle mage.

The Secret World is also incredibly open in the kind of character you can create. What did a I end up using there? Fist weapons and blood magic. Again, melee and magic.

My Templar alt has settled on swords and pistols. In GW2, my warrior uses axes/longbow, my thief uses daggers/pistols, and my mesmer uses sword/staff. All characters that combine melee and ranged abilities.

Is it any coincidence that I stopped playing Aion right around the time my melee abilities stopped being competitive with my ranged skills?

Hanging bodies in Blue MountainSo it’s clear that I prefer characters that are capable of fighting both with melee weapons and at range. Which makes sense, as I enjoy both. If I had to pick one, I would probably play ranged, but melee has a visceral thrill that ranged fighting just doesn’t quite equal. Plus, melee weapons are better aesthetically — they look more heroic.

As for which melee weapons, I prefer to dual wield weapons — usually swords — instead of using two-handed weapons. Plus, dual wielding tends to lead to faster attacks, which is what I prefer.

I also like characters that have at least some magical capacity. I’ll be honest; this is mostly just down to looks. Magic is pretty.

(Mini-rant: Why don’t games put more effort into making non-magical skills look good? You developers could really learn something from Aion here.)

My Norn thief in Hoelbrak in Guild Wars 2Reading it back, this seems kind of greedy of me. I want my character to be everything: ranged and melee, magical and physical.

But is that wrong? Why should our characters need to fit into rigid boxes? I won’t say that classes are a bad thing necessarily, but I feel they are often too confining.

One place where I have to give Guild Wars 2 credit is the way they let you interpret each archetype very broadly. A thief can be a subtle assassin, a sword-wielding brawler, a gunslinger, or artillery.

Classes do muddle the idea of an “ideal character” somewhat, as do game mechanics. I’ve always loved the idea of playing an archer, but most games tie bows to annoying crap like pets, minimum range, or an overabundance of ground target AoEs. So my view of what my ideal character would be may be somewhat skewed by the games I’ve played.

My ranger character in AionAlso, it’s probably impossible to ever get every experience you want from one character. If you like playing tanks and glass cannon DPS, you obviously can’t be both at once.

The ideal:

So my ideal character would likely be a female character with an athletic build, tied-back dark hair, and abilities  that combine fast melee skills with ranged magic.

Hmm, no wonder I liked Dungeon Siege III so much. I basically just described Anjali.

At the same time, it also seems clear to me I could never only play one character, no matter how closely it matched my ideal. We all need a change of pace now and then.

My mesmer showing off her gear in Rata SumWhat about you? Do you have an “ideal” RPG character? What would it be, and what makes it your ideal?

God damn it, now I’m upset there wasn’t a Dungeon Siege III expansion again. ><

F2P Versus P2P: The Fun Factor

I’ve talked before about MMO business models, and I’ve not been shy about my opinion that free to play is probably the way of the future, as well as my personal preference.

My Sylvari elementalist in Guild Wars 2But one thing I haven’t really addressed — and that I haven’t seen many people address — is how these two models affect the actual gameplay. As much as their proponents would like to ignore it, both models will affect the design of a game. Developers are businesses, and they’ll try to get you to spend as much money on their game as you can — whether by encouraging micro-transactions or trying to get you to subscribe for as long as possible.

This post isn’t about which model will cost you less money. It’s about what’s more fun.

But first…

A few caveats to get to first. Firstly, while I may talk broadly about the business models, I’ll admit that I’m mainly talking about World of Warcraft and Guild Wars 2. Those are the games I’m most familiar with. It is possible — though unlikely, I think — that one or both of these games are outliers and not representative of other games with their business models.

My Night Elf monk at the Peak of Serenity in World of Warcraft: Mists of PandariaIf anyone has found their experiences with other free to play and pay to play games to be different, please comment so I can expand my understanding.

And of course, this is all just my personal opinion, etcetera, etcetera.

On with the show!

You don’t have to use the cash shop… but we’d like it if you did:

Part of what inspired this post is a minor uproar among certain Guild Wars 2 fans regarding the in-game Halloween event, Shadow of the Mad King.

My thief showing off her stylish pimp hat in Guild Wars 2To make a long story short, many of the rewards for this holiday take the form of cosmetic weapon skins, and these can only be obtained as a random drop from Black Lion Chests. The Chests drop freely in the game, but the keys to open them are largely only available from the real money gem store.

You can still get the skins with gold by either converting gold to gems and buying keys or buying the skins directly from those lucky enough to get them to drop, but this is pricy in a game where gold is still relatively hard to come by.

People are upset by this, but I can’t see they’re surprised. ArenaNet always said the cash shop would provide cosmetic rewards.

It does raise the issue of whether or not the gem store is something onerous, though. I’m not at all bothered by the issue with the holiday skins, but I’ll admit there are times I feel the pressure of the cash shop.

My thief blasting with her pistols in Guild Wars 2For me, it’s transmutation stones. I’ve been spoiled by WoW. In WoW, I can, at any time, customize my gear’s appearance by going to a transmogrifier and swapping out skins. It costs little and is convenient.

To do the same in Guild Wars, I need to either pay real money or grind map completion achievements and/or gold to get transmutation stones, each of which is good for only one skin change to one piece of gear.

I still have enough stones to maintain a decent level of style most of the time, but the unreliability is somewhat frustrating.

Then again, I don’t need these stones. I can still access 100% of the game’s content without spending a dime. If I occasionally do so without a perfect outfit, well, I’m usually too busy enjoying the epic combat to even notice.

A hidden cave in Guild Wars 2Guild Wars encourages you to use the cash shop, but I’ve yet to see any situation where you’re forced to spend money.

You wanna stay? You stay here forever!

One expects a free to play game to steer people toward the cash shop. The general perception of the business model is that these games will nickel-and-dime you to death with their micro-transactions.

But pay to play games free you from such miserly game design, right? For the price of constant payments, you’re free to play the game as you desire.

Maybe not.

Lorewalker Cho telling me the tale of Emperor Shaohao in World of Warcraft: Mists of PandariaMists of Pandaria has a controversial endgame. Whereas once valor and justice points were an excellent way to get geared, they’re now harder to get, purchase less valuable gear relatively speaking, and require reputation to even spend.

On top of that, reputation is now much harder to get than it has been in years — perhaps even in the history of the game. Tabards are gone, leaving daily quests essentially the only option to earn reputation, and those daily quests award less than half the reputation dailies traditionally have.

The end result is a fairly massive grind just to reach the point you would be at simply by hitting max level in a previous expansion.

Many people say this grind is optional, and they are in the sense everything in the game is, but even Greg “Ghostcrawler” Street himself has said he doesn’t want them to be “too optional.” Blizzard wants you to do these dailies, and they’ve done everything they can to goad you into them.

The Clutches of Shek'zeer in the Dread Wastes in World of Warcraft: Mists of PandariaBlizzard says they want more people in the world, but I find it impossible to see this as anything but an attempt to stretch out content so people will, theoretically, stay subscribed longer. Slower progression means longer subs and more money.

Naturally, many people aren’t too happy about this. I count myself one of them, though I’ll admit gearing up is not quite the nightmare I expected. I’ve been able to do Mogu’shan Vaults via the Raid Finder despite skipping many of the dailies because they’re horrible.

Still, it’s an annoyance, much like the transmutation stones in Guild Wars 2. The main difference is Guild Wars 2’s annoyances are cosmetic, whereas WoW’s annoyances have the potential to leave me out of content by hobbling my progression.

Not to mention the issue of falling behind the gear curve if you stop playing for a while — though to be fair, Blizzard does work fairly hard to make this less damaging than it could be.

A herd of macaroni dragonsAnd then there’s the fact that many WoW players pay for more than their subs. There are the sparkle ponies, disco lions, and macaroni dragons. There are the pets.

These are cosmetic, true, but then there are server and faction transfers. Those can have major impacts on your gameplay — my enjoyment of my Horde characters increased immensely after moving to Wyrmrest Accord. And these transfers are not cheap, especially layered on top of subscription fees.

Getting down to it:

What it comes down to is this: both free to play and pay to play affect gameplay negatively. In both cases, the need to wring more money from players will compromise fun sooner or later. In neither case is it game-breaking, but nor is it as painless as developers would like you to believe.

For me personally, though, I feel more like I’m being nickle-and-dimed when I’m playing a subscription game. GW2 only asks for my money, whereas WoW asks for both my time and my money. To Blizzard, they’re one and the same. “Time is money, friend.”

My warlock battling the Sha in the Jade ForestWhereas GW2 gives me a choice about how much to spend, WoW sets a minimum and only goes up from there. Whereas GW2 only penalizes convenience and appearance if I don’t play their way, WoW penalizes my character’s performance and ability to access content.

I’m not saying it’s enough to completely turn me off WoW or subscription games, but it certainly runs contrary to the public perception of MMO business models.