The Age of “Hey, Remember When” Media

I’ve always had a great love for big fictional worlds. The kind that extend for decades of real world time over many different pieces of media. I love when you can explore a setting in that depth, and watch an imaginary world evolve over time. These days it feels like sprawling media franchises are more prevalent than ever, and you’d think I’d be happy, but I’m not.

Rey and Kylo Ren in Star Wars: Rise of Skywalker.Like anything, there’s a right way and a wrong to do a long-term media franchise, and I feel like these days most of them don’t grasp what’s appealing about these kind of big picture stories. Reusing familiar elements in a story is a tool, not an end unto itself, but I think modern media has lost sight of that. So many of the stories we see in these franchises today have nothing to say but, “Hey, remember when…”

I’ve been thinking about this for a while, but I was inspired to finally put virtual pen to virtual paper by a post by an old friend of mine from the GalacticaBBS days (gods, that was a lifetime ago). Over on his blog, he complains that the third season of Star Trek: Strange New Worlds spends too much time rehashing legacy characters and plot threads without any of the deeper social commentary traditionally seen in Star Trek.

This captures how I’ve felt about most modern Star Trek, and why I gave up on SNW after one season. I’ve often said that I don’t think the people in charge of the franchise right now don’t understand Star Trek.

When I say this, I often get pushback from people who will cite all all the callbacks to the franchise’s past throughout the modern shows, X Y or Z deep cut reference in the latest episode of Lower Decks or whatever. But that doesn’t really prove anything other than that the writers know how to read the Memory Alpha wiki.

Picard and Guinan in the second season of Star Trek: Picard.There’s a difference between knowledge and understanding. It’s possible that the modern writers do have genuine love for and knowledge of the franchise and still totally fail to understand the heart of what it’s about. I’ve met enough far right Trekkies in the fanbase over the years to know how common that can be.

(I’m not saying the new writers are right wingers, just that it’s a common example of how you can be a diehard fan of the franchise while completely misunderstanding its essence.)

So much of modern franchise media is like this. Just an endless string of callbacks, references, and plays to nostalgia without any deeper thought behind it, without the understanding of what made these characters and stories special the first time around.

“Hey, remember how people loved this plot? Let’s do it again! Hey, remember this character people loved? Let’s bring them back! Hey, remember when…”

The heroes of Azeroth assemble in World of Warcraft: Dragonflight.It’s not just Star Trek suffering from this, of course. A lot of Blizzard’s games have suffered from this in recent years. “Hey, remember how people liked the faction war? Let’s do that again! Hey, remember how the Dragons were cool? Let’s bring them back! Hey, remember the Skeleton King? Let’s throw him into the mobile game!”

There are other franchises that could be cited. Somehow, Palpatine returned…

There’s nothing inherently wrong with callbacks to the past. As I said at the start, I love it when it’s done well. Nostalgia is one of the most comforting feelings we can experience, and there can be plenty of beauty and meaning to media that’s based around it.

But you still need to do it with thought and creativity. For an example of nostalgia done well, I’ll again go back to Star Trek, and the one modern incarnation I actually liked: Prodigy.

The first season* of Prodigy is a fantastic example of a story that plays to nostalgia in an intelligent manner. Janeway is a familiar character, but she’s in a new role, an advisor and mentor rather than the ultimate authority on the cast. Tellarites and Medusans are previously established species, but they haven’t been main cast members before, and the other cast members represent new species.

A promotional image for Star Trek: ProdigyThe story also took place in a largely unknown area of space, and having the crew not be official members of Starfleet provided a new angle to the story. Initially irreverent to Starfleet’s many rules, they gravitate more and more towards living by its ideals as they come to understand it’s a better way to live. It was the perfect blend of familiar and original, capturing the spirit of what the franchise is meant to be while exploring its themes in a new way.

*(While I still found it more enjoyable than not, I think Prodigy’s second season did fall a bit into the “hey, remember when” trap, and that’s the main reason I rate it lower than the first season.)

After the blunders of Dragonflight, I would also say that World of Warcraft’s Worldsoul Saga arc is currently doing a decent of balancing the old and the new. Alleria has been around since Warcraft II, but they didn’t bring her back to fight Orcs again. She has a whole new role in the story as the face of Shadow as a force for good.

From what we’ve seen so far, the Midnight expansion is also shaping up to be a good example of nostalgia done the right way. We’re going back to Quel’thalas, but not to rehash the same story we had last time we were there. Instead of dealing with the Blood Elves’ magic addiction and their flirtations with demons, we will (hopefully) see a redeemed Quel’thalas uniting the world against the forces of the Void. It’s a familiar location, full of familiar faces, but it looks like it will be a fresh story all the same.

Alleria is done with Xally's shit.Cases like that are rarer than they should be, though. I think the problem is that in most cases the people behind these legacy franchises aren’t continuing them out of any passion for their stories, but simply out of a cynical desire to cash in on their name recognition.

You can’t make effective nostalgia bait if you don’t understand what made these things special in the first place. It needs to come from a place of genuine love.

It also needs to be said that a lot of people do genuinely just want more of the same. When legacy franchises do take chances with new directions, the fans often punish it, severely. See The Last Jedi, Stargate: Universe, Star Trek: Enterprise, and many other examples.

And even those of us who do complain often keep showing up anyway. We as consumers are culpable in the staleness of legacy franchises, and will continue to be so until we start being more discerning. Hence why I’m trying to be a bit more picky these days, and why I have up on current Trek shows beyond Prodigy (RIP).

With the executives of major media corporations more risk adverse than ever, I think the dominance of legacy franchises will continue for the foreseeable future. I can have the hope that we’ll see more cases like Prodigy and the Worldsoul Saga, which evoke nostalgia for the past while charting a new path, but I fear it’s going to be far more common to continue seeing media that has nothing to say beyond, “Hey, remember when…”

Star Wars Reviews: Rise of Skywalker and Solo

A few weeks ago, I rewatched The Last Jedi, and I was impressed by how much I enjoyed it. I realized that all of my problems with it are actually problems with The Force Awakens. If you pretend TLJ followed a film that actually gave you context on the current state of the galaxy and what’s going on, all the problems with TLJ melt away, and it turns into a truly excellent movie full of heart and emotion.

Rey and Kylo Ren in Star Wars: Rise of Skywalker.Feeling better about Star Wars than ever, I was inspired to give one of the spin-off movies a watch on Netflix, and to go see Rise of Skywalker sooner rather than later.

I now bring you my thoughts on the two films.

Rise of Skywalker:

I have not hated a movie this much in a long time.

The Force Awakens was pretty much just a rehash of A New Hope, and with JJ Abrams back at the helm, my fear was that Rise of Skywalker would just be a rehash of Return of the Jedi.

This fear was justified. It is absolutely just a clone of what’s come before, right down to yet another super weapon with a single and easily exploitable weakness, because apparently there’s only one story that’s ever allowed to be told in this setting.

If you have watched the trailers, there is no need to see the movie. They’ve already given away the whole story.

There is only one genuine surprise in the entire movie, and it’s an incredibly cheap twist that utterly ruins everything that made Rey compelling as a character. Meanwhile her unique rivalry/bond with Kylo Ren is reduced to just another cheap love story.

Poe and C3PO in Star Wars: Rise of Skywalker.

I’ve never been a big Star Wars fan, but I’ve stuck with this new trilogy because I absolutely adore Rey as a character, and Rise of Skywalker systematically destroyed everything that ever made her story interesting.

None of this is on Daisy Ridley, mind you. She remains an excellent actress, and she makes a heroic effort to inject some life into this soulless, illogical mess of a movie, but it’s just not enough.

Also on the subject of excellent actresses who couldn’t save this movie, Kelly Marie Tran’s character Rose — one of the best things about The Last Jedi — is now sidelined so much she might as well not even be there. It’s hard to see this as anything but a capitulation to the racist and sexist trolls who hated her character, and it’s despicable.

Meanwhile Kylo Ren/Ben Solo also has his entire character arc destroyed by making it just a rehash of Vader’s journey in Return of the Jedi. I don’t want him to be “redeemed” to the Light Side. He’s right. He’s the only character in the whole franchise who’s actually trying to make things better.

Yes, he makes the wrong choices in how to achieve his goals, and that’s what makes him compelling as an antagonist, but he’s the only one who sees how the traditional structures of Jedi and Sith have failed the galaxy. He’s the only one who understands that the old ways have to change if the cycle of war is ever going to end.

Rey and her companions in Star Wars: Rise of Skywalker.Or he was, until JJ Abrams decided that all nuance must burn.

You can also pick apart the copious plot holes and continuity errors — Leia’s lightsaber is green in one scene and blue in the next, ships are frequently chased through hyper-space jumps even though the last movie was almost entirely about how that’s virtually impossible under normal circumstances, Poe is appointed to a leadership position by Leia even though the last movie made a major plot point of the fact he’s not leadership material — but that’s just the garden variety dumb I’ve come to expect of Star Wars. On its own, I could forgive that.

But Rise of Skywalker fumbles all the character arcs and major plots of the trilogy. It takes all of the potential created by The Last Jedi and throws it in the trash. All the nuance introduced by the last movie is ignored. There’s no acknowledgment that the Jedi are also to blame for the state of the galaxy. There’s no further exploration of the systemic issues in the galaxy that keep the war going. We’re back to a shallow fairy-tale where Jedi are good no matter what, and Sith are bad no matter what, and if those evil Sith are killed everything will be sunshine and rainbows for ever and ever. Let’s all cheer Rey as she heroically seeks the genocide of another culture!

What a disaster.

Overall rating: 2.5/10 Worse than the prequels. The prequels were bad from the start, but this trilogy had all the ingredients of a truly powerful story, and Rise of Skywalker squandered them all.

Solo:

Han Solo and Chewbacca in Solo: A Star Wars Story.I liked this one a lot better, though that’s a low bar.

The thing about Solo is that I liked most of it, but it just never really seemed to come together into a cohesive whole.

My one major complaint is the character of Qi’ra, his love interest. I’m generally in favour of prequels, but this is one case where being a prequel really sucked the drama out of the story. We know Qi’ra isn’t in the picture by the time of the original trilogy, so the only question is whether she dies or betrays him. You can’t really get invested in her or her story, and the whole movie is pretty much just about Han trying to get her back, and I think that really sucks the life out of it.

Other than that, it’s a solid ride. Being Star Wars, there’s no shortage of action and beautiful imagery. The iconic Kessel Run sequence definitely lives up to the decades of expectation built around it.

There’s some memorable side characters, too. Droid rights activist L3-37 particularly stands out. The show kind of ping pongs between different groups of side characters, though, so none of them quite get the screen time they deserve.

On the downside, Alden Ehrenreich’s Solo himself is probably the weak point of the cast. I think this is less his fault and more down to Harrison Ford being such a tough act to follow. I honestly feel bad for the kid. Those are such big shoes to fill; there are so few people who can hold a candle to Ford’s charisma.

Donald Glover as Landa Calrissian in Solo: A Star Wars Story.All in all, Solo’s a decent ride, but it does end up feeling like less than the sum of its parts. Its tortured production process does show, and it’s definitely about thirty minutes longer than it needs to be.

Overall rating: 6.9/10