Retro Review: Once Upon a Time, Season One: Episodes 1-6

As someone with a craving for quality high fantasy television, I’ve long had an interest in Once Upon a Time, but for one reason or another, I didn’t find the time to give it a shot when it premiered. I did see a few episodes here or there in my final months in Toronto, but they were all out of order.

The logo for Once Upon a TimeWhat I saw left with me with some mixed feelings. At times, the show seemed very clever and offered a great portrayal of old school fantasy, but at other times it was so smarmy it made me want to puke. I didn’t much care for Emma, the main character, but I loved many of the peripheral characters.

Overall, the good seemed to outweigh the bad, and now that I’ve finally signed up for Netflix, I’m going to start watching the series properly and in order.

As with previous binge watches, my individual episode reviews may be a bit more truncated and spoilery than usual.

Pilot episode:

Once Upon a Time wastes very little in establishing the format and overall arc of the series. Like the other episodes I’ve seen, the pilot jumps between scenes in our world and flashbacks to a fantasy kingdom to tell a cohesive story.

Our hero is Emma Swan, a bail “bondsperson” who is contacted out of the blue by the son she gave up for adoption, Henry. She is forced to take him back home to a small town called Storybrook, and along the way, he regales her with outlandish stories about how Emma and everyone in Storybrook are actually exiles from a fairytale land, and how it’s Emma’s destiny to save them all.

The wedding of Snow White and Prince Charming in Once Upon a TimeExcept they’re not just stories.

As this is happening, the pilot also illustrates the final days of the fantasy kingdom as an evil queen unleashes a terrible curse to end all happy endings. The imprisoned black magician Rumpelstiltskin* foresees the only hope will come from the daughter of Snow White and Prince Charming , and they call upon their allies to save the newborn Emma at all costs.

*(Played by Robert Carlyle, who is awesome.)

The rest of the episode deals with Emma attempting to wash her hands of Henry, and largely failing. As this happens, the seeds of a rivalry between her and Regina, Storybrook’s mayor and the evil queen in truth, are sewn.

The pacing is good, and there’s an emotional punch without it being too overwrought. A lot of the actors already seem very comfortable in their roles, and the characterizations come through strongly — though it probably helps that I already have some familiarity with the characters.

Something I really enjoy about Once Upon a Time is all the clever little ways events and characters in our world mirror the fantasy world, and that’s already on full display. Regina offering Emma some apple cider, for instance.

Emma and her son, Henry, in Once Upon a TimeIf I have a complaint, it’s the pilot ended too soon and left me wanting more… but that’s not really a complaint.

Overall rating: 8/10 A strong start.

“The Thing You Love Most”:

As with most shows, the second episode of Once Upon a Time is a little on the slow side.

In Storybrook, Regina does everything in her power to drive Emma away. If I was coming in fresh, I’d find this all very unreasonable and a bit strange, but based on later episodes I’m seen, I’m of the impression Regina still knows who she is and thus likely knows what Emma represents.

On the fantasy end of things, we learn the backstory of Regina’s use of the curse, and the terrible cost she had to pay for it.

I don’t really have any major complaints about this episode. It’s just not terribly memorable. Also, again, I don’t much care for Emma. The actress just doesn’t feel authentic. She’s trying too hard to seem tough.

Lana Parilla as Regina Mills in Once Upon a TimeThe one interesting thing to come out of this — that was news to me — is that Regina’s father’s name was Henry. Hmm…

Overall rating: 6.9/10

“Snow Falling”:

As the name might imply, this episode focuses heavily on Snow White. Specifically, the start of her relationship with Prince Charming — which turns out to be a mocking nickname she gave him.

On the fantasy side of things, Snow is a brigand living in the woods for fear of being caught by the evil queen. She robs Charming as he passes by, and he hunts her down and blackmails her into helping him retrieve what she stole.

It starts out as one of those “trying so hard not to be cliche it feels terribly cliche” things, but the plot evolves well, and it has a lot of action and excitement. It’s perhaps a bit hokey, but hokey in a way that’s more endearing than irritating — which based on my experience to date is probably an apt description of Once Upon a Time as a whole.

Meanwhile, in Storybrook, a field trip to the hospital leads to Henry learning that Prince Charming is in that reality a comatose John Doe. He gets it in his head that if Mary Margaret — Snow White in truth — were to read their story to him, he might wake up, and an in an attempt to not hurt Henry’s feelings, she and Emma choose to indulge him.

Snow White and Prince Charming in Once Upon a TimeBut as is often the case, Henry’s ideas aren’t so crazy after all.

The most interesting thing about the Storybrook side of “Snow Falling” is once again all the subtle ways it mirrors the events of the fantasy world, like David/Charming being drawn to the toll bridge and Mary Margaret waking him with mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

Also, the normal world versions of the Seven Dwarfs really crack me up.

On the whole, I do find Snow White a much more compelling protagonist than Emma. She’s got the perfect balance of spunk, toughness, and humanity, along with a healthy dose of charisma, and the actress seems to be having almost too much fun with the role.

Overall rating: 7.6/10 Less Emma makes for a better episode.

“The Price of Gold”:

We continue to run down the list of classic fairytales. Today, Cinderella’s up to bat.

But there’s a twist. In this version of things, Cinderella won her grand life not through the blessing of a faerie godmother, but through a deal with Rumpelstiltskin, and as he is so fond of reminding people, all magic has a price. In this case, the price is a child.

Events in the real and fantasy worlds mirror each other as Rumpelstiltskin/Mr. Gold attempts to claim ownership of Cinderella/Ashley’s soon to be born child. In the real world, Emma travels across town to try to save Ashley and the child as the circumstances shine an uncomfortable light on Emma’s own past.

This was one of those times where Once Upon a Time just felt a little too smarmy for my taste. They tried so hard to make Cinderella sympathetic that it felt cloying, and the episode just hammered home the whole redemption/anyone can change angle a little too heavily.

Robert Carlyle as Rumpelstiltskin in Once Upon a TimeAlso, it was a very Emma-heavy episode, and I think my feelings on her are clear at this point.

On the plus side, the nod to the darker side of fairytales and the terrible price of magic was quite cool, and there was a lot of Robert Carlyle in this episode, and that’s always a good thing.

Overall rating: 6.8/10

“That Still Small Voice”:

And now it’s Jiminy Cricket’s turn.

In Storybrook, he’s Henry psychologist, Dr. Hopper — I see what you did there, Once Upon a Time.

When a sudden earthquake exposes an old mining tunnel, Henry becomes convinced Regina is keeping a secret there key to uncovering Storybrook’s true nature. He’s determined to explore the mine despite the dangers, so Regina coerces Dr. Hopper into denouncing Henry’s “fantasies.”

Naturally, Henry doesn’t take this well, and he runs off to explore the mine on his own, becoming trapped. The race is then on for Emma, Regina, and Dr. Hopper to save him.

Jennifer Morrison as Emma Swan in Once Upon a TimeOn the fantasy side of things, we learn how Jimmy became a cricket in the first place. Perhaps not surprisingly, it involves Rumpelstiltskin. And it gets surprisingly dark.

I really do hope that some definitive proof of Storybrook’s true nature is uncovered soon, because the inevitable “you’re crazy, Henry” speech is getting very tiresome. It’s good the show acknowledges how preposterous the whole situation is, and it makes sense for Emma to be skeptical, but it’s the same scene every episode, and we as viewers know Henry’s right, so it feels quite redundant.

Otherwise, I felt this was a solid episode. One thing that was particularly interesting was seeing some nuance added to Regina’s character. This is the first time it’s been clear that she really does care about Henry, and seeing her put aside her loathing for Emma for his sake was a powerful moment.

I may not be a particular fan of Emma, but her interactions with Regina can sometimes be quite interesting. They’re so at odds, but they’re united in wanting to protect Henry.

…I can only imagine the slash fics that must exist involving those two.

Overall rating: 7.5/10

“The Sheperd”:

This is one of those times when I have very mixed feelings on Once Upon a Time. There’s much I like about this episode, and much I don’t.

Josh Dallas as Prince Charming in Once Upon a TimeThis time, the focus is on Prince Charming… who turns out to not be such a prince after all. He just plays one in real life. On the Storybrook side of things, he’s torn between his feelings for Mary Margaret, and his loyalty to his wife, who is notable for not being Snow White in any reality.

Snow White and Prince Charming are one of the highlights of the show. They’re very likable characters, and the actors who play them have a lot of charisma. It’s very hard not to like them. So any episode that focuses on them earns some points.

And the fight with the dragon was quite cool, if a bit brief for my taste.

But this another case of laying the emotion on a bit thick, and having David/Charming go back to his wife is disappointing, and not for the reasons the show intended. I don’t need to have seen later episodes to know he’ll end up with Mary/Snow; why waste our time pretending that’s in doubt?

It also doesn’t make a lot of sense for Charming to have been able to pull off all his feats of martial prowess if he was really just a shepherd. The overall impression is it was a very short amount of time between his being ushered off the farm and meeting Snow. How’d he become an expert archer and swordsman in that time?

Overall rating: 7/10

Retro Reviews: In Time and Moon

In Time:

In Time is a movie that intrigued me greatly out of the gate with its inventive premise. I then lost interest almost immediately when I learned it was starring Justin Timberlake. Sorry, but I just couldn’t see some pretty boy from N’Sync being a good enough actor to carry what I thought to be an intellectual sci-fi drama.

Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried in the movie In TimeBut I heard a lot of good things about it, and it remained hovering in the back of my mind, so I decided to give it a shot.

In Time has one of the best premises I’ve seen in a long time. It’s based on the idea that humans have cracked the secret of immortality, and no one ages after their twenty-fifth birthday, but eternity comes at a price: Time is now a currency traded for goods and services, and the poor are at constant risk of death from “timing out,” while only the wealthy truly enjoy eternal youth.

By necessity, the impoverished cannot be allowed a chance at advancement. If everyone was immortal, there wouldn’t be enough space or resources to sustain everyone. Thus, the system is designed to keep most people in perpetual poverty, with only enough time to make it through the next day. “For some to be immortal, many must die.”

It’s a brilliant concept that serves as a chillingly accurate metaphor for what capitalism has done to the real world. Unfortunately, In Time does everything in its power to squander the potential of that premise.

The story centers around a ghetto kid by the name of Will Salas. By sheer chance, Will happens across a wealthy man who has grown tired of immortality. Longing for the peace of death, he gives all his time — over a century — to Will, offering him a chance at the high life.

A forearm display of a person's dwindling time from the movie In TimeBut this is more a curse than a gift. Will is thought to have murdered the man for his time, and he is pursued by the authorities. Along the way, he abducts Sylvia Weis (played Amana Seyfried), the daughter of one of the world’s richest men, as a hostage, and they soon become a futuristic Bonnie and Clyde, with a twist of Robin Hood. They go around robbing banks and showering time on the poor.

The problem with In Time is that it’s clear little to no thought was put into it beyond the basic premise.

Many things are not explained or just don’t make any sense. There is no attempt to explain how the immortality and time-trading technology works or how it came to be, and what’s even more bothersome is that this system has obviously existed for at least a century, but In Time’s technology is no more advanced than our own. Quite the opposite, in fact — technology seems to have regressed considerably, and there is again no explanation for this.

An early scene that was probably supposed to be heartbreaking but ended up just being ridiculous involved Will’s mother rushing home to get some time from him. She didn’t have enough to pay for the bus and ultimately timed out moments before reaching Will.

But all I could think was, “Why didn’t she call him? They don’t have cellphones in the future? Not even a payphone? He could have just met her halfway.”

As it turns out, they do have payphones. Quite a lot of them, in fact, as evidenced by many scenes later in the movie. But in this movie, logic and continuity take a backseat to expediency, and the film suffers for it severely. Will’s mother not being able to find one of the many payphones, or have a cellphone, or even a bloody pager, is just one example.

Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried in the movie In TimeIt applies to the characters, as well. Will is at first portrayed as very noble and pure-hearted — almost cartoonishly so — but then all of a sudden he’s taking hostages and robbing and causing all kinds of mayhem. He’s just an average factory worker from the ghetto, but somehow he’s able to take down cops and hardened killers almost effortlessly, even when outnumbered and outgunned. Sylvia initially hates and fears Will for kidnapping and abusing her, but in what appears to be a matter of hours, she develops the world’s fastest case of Stockholm syndrome and suddenly falls for him.

I’ll choose to ignore the disturbing and possibly sexist undertones of this and just focus on what lazy writing it is.

There’s even a Michael Bay Transformers-esque chase scene where the characters are in the middle of the city one moment and out in the middle of the countryside the next.

In writing, we talk about the difference between an idea and a story. A good idea doesn’t make a good story. It needs to be developed and fleshed out with things like character development and good plotting.

In Time never got past the idea stage. It’s not a bad story, because it’s not a story at all.

The only thing I can praise about this movie is a speech given by one of the villains near the end. He talks about how the system will never change because everyone is too in love with the idea of immortality. People will happily endure all the death and suffering for the hope of one day living forever, no matter how poor their chances actually are.

Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried in the movie In TimeThis is exactly why the injustices of the real world perpetuate. No one cares that the rich stand atop the broken bodies of the poor, because everything thinks they’re going to be rich one day — their aspirations blind them to the fact they’re just another corpse in the pile, celebrating those who are drunk on their blood.

In this, we see a tantalizing glimpse of the brilliant film In Time could have been but steadfastly wasn’t.

Also, Justin Timberlake actually wasn’t that bad. Wouldn’t nominate him for an Oscar anytime soon, but he did a decent job. I did enjoy all the subtle mannerisms he put on to convincingly portray someone from a very impoverished background — such as the way he devours his food like a starving person.

Overall rating: 3.8/10 This movie stole two hours of my life, and I want them back.

Moon:

Moon is a film I’ve been curious about for a while, but it took me until now to get around to seeing it. I’d heard a lot of good things, and it’s the brainchild of Duncan Jones, who will be directing the Warcraft movie.

Sam Rockwell in MoonMoon didn’t live up to the hype, but it also wasn’t bad enough to give me serious concerns about the Warcraft film.

I’m afraid I’m going to have to give away pretty much the whole plot of the movie in this review. It can’t really be avoided because the one significant twist comes very early on, and I wouldn’t have anything to discuss otherwise.

The story follows Sam Bell (played by Sam Rockwell), a technician serving a three year contract as the sole human on a mining base on the moon. His only companion is a HAL 9000-esque AI called GERTY (voiced by Kevin Spacey), and after three years alone, Sam’s mind is coming apart at the seams. His increased hallucinations lead him to be severely hurt in a crash.

Sam awakens in the base’s infirmary, but he quickly realizes something fishy is going on. GERTY is determined not to let him leave the base, but he manages to escape and finds the crash site… and his unconscious self inside.

So clones. It soon becomes clear that both versions of Sam are but copies of the real Sam Bell, and that the moon base is in fact operated by an endless procession of disposable clones, the real Sam having been back on Earth for years. Most of the movie then deals with their attempts to grapple with this realization and find a way out of the predicament.

Sam Bell talking with... Sam Bell in MoonIt’s an interesting premise, and Sam Rockwell delivers excellent performances as both clones. There’s a lot of emotional weight to this movie, and it has a very haunting quality further improved by an excellently ambient soundtrack.

However, the problem is there’s a lot about Moon that makes little to no sense.

For one thing, why does the moon base need a human running it at all? The vast majority of its work is done by automation, and what Sam actually does aside from ferry packages of ore is at best unclear. I find it hard to believe the enormous effort necessary to create and maintain a small army of clones is a better solution than full automation or just paying real humans.

GERTY doesn’t make much sense either. It’s clear a lot of his purpose is to keep the clone thing a secret, but with no real coercion, he reveals the full truth and then proceeds to help the clones break free. It just feels contrived.

And why go to the trouble of building a whole field of jamming towers when they could just disable communications on the main base? Just have GERTY hide the truth…

And how does the first Sam survive several days unconscious in a crashed lunar rover, especially when his health was already failing?

The two versions of Sam Bell in MoonAgain, there’s so much that feels contrived.

Also, I hate to be That Guy, but the special effects were very poor. So many of the exterior shots are just obviously fake. I know it was a pretty low budget movie and you can’t expect too much from it, but still…

Moon is an interesting movie, but it has a lot of flaws. I wanted to like it more than I ultimately did.

Overall rating: 6.3/10