Fantasy Cliches I Could Do Without

I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say I’m one of the biggest fantasy fans you’re ever going to encounter. I eat, sleep, and breath fantasy. I watch the movies, play the games, and read the books. I also write the books.

A high fantasy-themed image created for a graphics contest at GalacticaBBS.comBut that doesn’t mean I think the genre is perfect. While I love almost everything about high fantasy, there are still a few common cliches, tropes, and plot elements I really wish would just go away.

Black magic is bad, mkay?

There’s a perception in fantasy that using certain dark types of magic — like necromancy, for example — will instantly and permanently stain your soul, automatically turning you into a bad person.

There seems a certain logic to this, but a lot of stories take it to illogical extremes. If you’re raising the dead to shake down people for cash, well, yeah, that’s bad.

(Hmm, has anyone done a necromantic gangster novel yet?)

But this cliche states that even if you were raising the dead to stop a rampaging band of brigands who are coming to slaughter the women and rape the cattle, that still makes you evil.

Now, I’m not talking about a slippery slope argument. A slippery slope is something I’d happily accept. This cliche paints it as a cliff: if you use any dark magic at any time for any reason, you automatically become a villain.

Art of a necromancerI’m sorry, but that makes no sense.

Magic is power, and people have free will. They can use that power for good or for ill. The idea that using even one spell from the bad side of the magical spectrum, even with the best of intentions, will somehow rob you of any moral compass doesn’t make sense logically, and it doesn’t do anything to make a story more interesting. It takes choice away from the characters and makes both them and the plot bland.

I think the Warcraft universe has perhaps the most interesting take on magic in the fantasy genre. In Warcraft, all magic is dark. It is always corrupting and addictive, and it attracts Demons like a candle attracts moths.

Many cultures in Warcraft believe using certain kinds of magic — or any magic at all — will invariably corrupt you and lead you down the path to darkness, but it’s just that: a belief.

Despite the fact that Warcraft’s magic is an innately corrupting force, we still have many protagonists who use magic, even the darkest magic, for good ends — from Jaina Proudmoore to Illidan Stormrage.

Art of Illidan Stormrage at the Black TempleBecause they have free will, and they can resist the dark temptations of magic.

Bowing to the inevitable:

Fate is an extremely common concept in fantasy. As a plot element, I’m fairly indifferent to it. It’s over-used and rarely adds much to the story, but it can be quite interesting when some creativity is applied.

What bothers me is when fate in a story is not only unalterable, but something characters fatalistically surrender to. They simply gave up in the face of whatever horror is coming their way.

The essence of drama is conflict. So where, pray tell, is the drama in a story where the “heroes” simply lie down and wait for the end?

Particular offenders for this would be “The Ancient Blades” and Frank Herbert’s “Dune” series. I remember coming to despise Paul Atreides because he just stood there and accepted it as terrible things happened to himself and those he loved.

Paul Atreides from the movie DuneThat’s not a hero. That’s a coward.

Now, maybe it’s realistic that people would just give up in the face of a fate that cannot be changed. But as we’ve discussed, true realism isn’t always the best choice in fiction.

Unrealistic or not, I want to see characters fight against fate. Even if they fail, I want the struggle.

To wield power, you must give up your humanity:

There’s a perception in a lot of fantasy and science fiction that to wield power effectively, without being corrupt, you need to divorce yourself from your humanity. You cannot allow yourself to love, to be ruled by compassion, or to feel anger — even righteous anger.

A prominent example of this would be the Jedi in the Star Wars universe. They forbid their members to marry and counsel against all passionate feeling.

This concept is offensively illogical, and frankly a little disturbing. Does anyone out there really believe that the only way to do good in the world is to rip out all that makes you human? Even anger and hate have their place and can do good when directed to righteous ends.

Ewan McGregor as Obi-Wan KenobiThis kind of logic is how holocausts get justified.

Getting back to Star Wars, I always viewed Darth Vader as a creation of the Jedi, not the Sith. Anakin was a man of great passion and furious emotion, and the Jedi tried to extinguish that spark. How could he not turn to the Sith in such circumstances?

By trying to force a square peg into a round hole, the Jedi created the very monster they were trying to prevent. They treated Anakin like someone who was more machine than man, so that’s exactly what he became.

Of course, Star Wars is far too simple-minded to acknowledge such complexities, and I’ve probably just put more thought into the prequels than Lucas did.

Royal protagonists:

Fantasy books about princes and princesses are a dime a dozen. Honestly, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with making your main characters royalty. The problem is that writers rarely apply creativity to the concept.

Art of Llane Wrynn, king of StormwindThe ironic thing, and the main thing that irritates me, is that fantasy writers will almost invariably bend over backwards to make their royal characters as un-royal as possible.

They always hate the trappings of court, they always wish they didn’t have such great responsibilities, and they always prefer to spend their days doing unrefined things like hunting and sword-fighting.

There was a probably a time where this idea was daring and original, but that time is long since past.

I would like a fantasy writer to create some royal protagonists who embrace their royal status. They like the fancy clothes, the pompous ceremonies, and everyone kissing their ass. You can be a hero and still be an arrogant jerk. There’s nothing wrong with protagonists being less than perfect.

In fairness, it should be noted I, too, have frequently written about royalty, but at least I didn’t go out of my way to make their royal status as small a part of their personality as possible.

Art of Eversong Woods from World of Warcraft* * *

I could probably think of some more, but those are the most ubiquitous fantasy concepts that get under my skin.

What are some fantasy cliches that you wish would just go away?

New article:

My latest WhatMMO article is 6 MMO Concepts That Should Be Banned.

Seriously, if I have to play one more game about rampaging dragons…

Is Fantasy Music a Thing?

Sometimes, I like to consult with my real life friends and family for ideas of what to talk about on my blog — you try coming up with 120 posts a year without any help. One conversation comes up a lot when I do this.

“Tyler, you should post about the bands you like! It’s your blog; it should be about your interests.”

Emi9ly Haines, leader singer of MetricAt which point I calmly explain, “The blog is about sci-fi and fantasy, my writing, and where those two intertwine. Music doesn’t have anything to do with sci-fi or fantasy.”

And it’s true, isn’t it? There’s no such thing as sci-fi/fantasy music. Sure, there’s soundtracks for sci-fi/fantasy works, and I have talked about them a bit, and then there’s filk, but… we’re not going to be talking about filk.

True fantasy music — serious, professional music on fantastical themes intended to be enjoyed on its own merits — isn’t something I ever thought existed.

But now, I’m not so sure.

So this band is pretty cool:

Lately, I’ve become quite enamored with the Icelandic folk group Of Monsters and Men. Aside from their music being quite pleasing to the ear, they fascinate me because they seem to be producing what can only be called high fantasy music.

Probably the best example of this, and not coincidentally my favourite of their songs, is King and Lionheart:

Howling ghosts they reappear
In mountains that are stacked with fear
But you’re a king, and I’m a lionheart
And in the sea that’s painted black
Creatures lurk below the deck
But you’re a king, and I’m a lionheart
And as the world comes to an end,
I’ll be here to hold your hand
Cause you’re my king, and I’m your lionheart

Fighting ghosts and sea monsters at the apocalypse. If that isn’t high fantasy, I don’t know what is. Heck, this song is basically the story of a couple from my own writing. I think my favourite thing about this song is just the nostalgia for my story.

I don’t seem to be the only one with this idea, either. Reading the comments on YouTube, this song appears to have been adopted by the community of Merlin/Arthur shippers. I didn’t even know there were Merlin/Arthur shippers, but I guess I shouldn’t be surprised.

While none of their other songs or so epic or badass as King and Lionheart, Of Monsters and Men does several other songs that seem quite in the realm of high fantasy. They’re just a bit more eccentric, more whimsical.

The next best example would be Dirty Paws. Its lyrics are probably just a metaphor I’m too thick to grasp, but taken at face value, it appears to be about a war between the animals in a magical forest:

The forest of talking trees,
They used to sing about the birds and the bees
The bees had declared a war
The sky wasn’t big enough for them all
The birds, they got help from below
From dirty paws and the creatures of snow

It took a while for this song to grow on me, and when I first heard it, I only listened through the whole thing because I wanted to hear how the story ended. “DID THE BIRDS WIN? I NEED TO KNOW!”

This is not a typical reaction to a song for me.

While I’m not so big a fan of it, the song From Finner is also a good example. My understanding is that From Finner is about a group of people living in a cottage on a whale’s back.

Even when their songs are not obviously fantastical, their music tends to have a certain power to them that feels very reminiscent of what I love about the fantasy genre.

Take, for example, Your Bones:

Troubled spirits on my chest
Where they laid to rest
The birds all left, my tall friend
As your body hit the sand
Million stars up in the sky
Formed a tiger’s eye
That looked down on my face
Out of time, and out of place

I don’t know about you, but this just makes me picture some tragic hero taking a moment to reflect before he draws his sword and charges into the maw of darkness.

Ultimately, it’s the stories this band tells that really suck me into their music. They’re not writing songs; they’re writing sagas.

I have mixed feelings on them in some ways — I don’t care for Ragnar’s voice overmuch, and I feel they can be a bit pretentious at times — but the stories they tell keep my interest. It feels like listening to an epic fantasy novel.

Late to the party again?

Now that I think about it, it does occur to me that Of Monsters and Men may not be a unique example of speculative (sci-fi/fantasy) music. Isn’t there a Rush song that’s supposed to be about being chased by giant robots or something?

There’s also that Iron Man song by Ozzy Osbourne, and as much as it pains me to say it, I must admit some of Led Zeppelin’s songs flirt with the fantastical.

Zeppelin. How I loathe thee.

Metric performing liveHeck, even my all-time favourite band, Metric, strayed into the speculative a little bit with Stadium Love, a song about everything living thing on Earth being herded into an arena and forced to fight to the death.

I never suspected Metric of substance abuse until I heard that song…

So maybe Of Monsters and Men isn’t as original as I thought. But they’re still pretty cool.

* * *

So what do you think? Is my theory of high fantasy music crazy like a fox, or crazy like Fox News?

…Also, I must sincerely apologize for subjecting you to my awful taste in music. You may commence mocking me at your leisure.