Deliverance of Dragons Review and Final Thoughts on the Dragon Prophecy Trilogy

Over a decade ago, I read the first book of the Dragon Prophecy trilogy. It was a prequel to the Obsidian trilogy, a series I’d loved when I was a teenager. There was a long wait until the second book, to the point I started to worry the series had been cancelled. This was followed by an even longer wait, and eventually I all but entirely gave up hope of ever seeing the series finished.

Cover art for The Dragon Prophecy, book three: Deliverance of Dragons.But a few weeks ago, I stepped into Indigo for the first time in ages, and on the very bottom of the final shelf of the fantasy section a book jumped out at me: The Dragon Prophecy, book three: Deliverance of Dragons.

Well I’ll be damned.

It had been so long I decided to reread the first two books to refresh my memory, but now I’ve finished them and Deliverance of Dragons itself, and my conclusion is that this is a real mixed bag of a series.

For most of its 700+ pages, I thoroughly enjoyed Deliverance. It’s powerful, dramatic, and wildly fantastical — everything I want in an epic fantasy novel. Unfortunately, it completely falls apart in the last few chapters.

I did some digging online to try and see if I could find a reason for this, and I couldn’t find anything definitive, but it seems to be assumed among the fans that some degree of publisher interference was at play — a too harsh limit on length or something of the sort.

That would certainly explain a lot. There’s multiple major plot twists that are either wildly rushed or never even followed up on at all, and the ending itself is an anticlimax of the highest order. It seems to attempt to deliver something like a classical “happily ever after” despite the entire series up to that point constantly, brutally hammering home that there was never going to be a happy ending for Vieliessar Farcarinon. It’s just a mess.

I know this has been labelled as a trilogy from the very start, but my overwhelming impression of the ending of Deliverance of Dragons is that there was meant to be a fourth book that got cancelled, and so another ~700 pages of story had to be condensed down into about thirty pages.

It’s a shame, because it really is a great book up until that ending. It’s an odd thing to praise, but one thing I really love about this book is how absolutely, brutally gorey the action sequences can be.

This is the highest of high fantasy, with no human characters and a pretty good chunk of the cast not even being humanoid. Almost every plot point is about incredible magic, ancient prophecies, and the idiosyncrasies of people who are far removed from familiar human mindsets. The brutality of the combat brings it back down to earth, and makes it feel chillingly real despite the fantastical subject matter.

Overall rating: 7/10

Having blitzed through the entire trilogy in one go, I’ve been mulling over my opinions of it as a whole. My conclusion is that it is a deeply flawed series but one which nevertheless holds my affection.

The Dragon Prophecy suffers badly from the slow start of its first book, its ridiculously over-complicated Elven naming conventions, inconsistent pacing, a bloated cast where only a few characters are meaningfully fleshed out, a failure to fully deliver on all the events and mysteries it promises, and the unfinished seeming ending of the final book.

But it also features epic conflict, gripping drama, changes to its setting far beyond what most books dare to do, and a vibrant fantasy world overflowing with wondrous magic and bizarre and colourful creatures.

Rereading it all, I was struck by how utterly unashamed of its own fantastical nature this series is, and how hungry for that I’ve been.

When I found Deliverance of Dragons, it was after I’d already scanned all the rest of the fantasy section and found absolutely nothing that appealed to me. Everything these days seems to be entirely about humans and their conflicts, about politics and edgy orphans and stories that don’t seem to meaningfully touch on fantasy elements. It feels like the fantasy genre has left me behind.

Of course, there’s nothing wrong with genre trends changing, and I’m not saying the books being made now are objectively worse, but it’s just not what I want. It feels like the kind of fantasy I love just doesn’t exist anymore, at least not in the form of literature. Everyone is writing nothing but Game of Thrones and Hunger Games knock-offs, when I want Lord of the Rings knock-offs.

For that reason, I remain grateful for The Dragon Prophecy. It’s a series that’s probably only worth it for a specific niche of hardcore high fantasy fans, but I am exactly in that niche, and despite its flaws, for me Deliverance of Dragons felt like a sip of cold water in the desert.

I think I’m going to try rereading the Obsidian trilogy next. I suspect it won’t seem quite as impressive as it did when I was a teenager, but that it will still help satisfy my craving for some traditional high fantasy.

Final Thoughts on The Gates of Good and Evil

After many delays — both on my end and the publishers’ — I have finally gotten around to finishing the last two books of Ian Irvine’s The Gates of Good and Evil quartet, The Perilous Tower and The Sapphire Gate. The Gates of Good and Evil is itself the latest continuation of the sprawling Three Worlds Cycle that began with The View from the Mirror.

Cover art for The Gates of Good and Evil, book four: The Sapphire Gate by Ian Irvine.

Look, ma, I’m a cover quote.

Ian Irvine is one of my favourite authors, and I’ve loved the Three Worlds setting since I was a teenager, but this latest series underwhelmed me in the first two books. Sadly, that remains true for the final two, as well.

Irvine remains a master of action and pacing. The books are still page-turners, and there are some genuinely thrilling and epic moments, but overall, the story fails to reach the heights achieved by previous books in the saga.

As with the first two entries in Gates of Good and Evil, the villains remain one of the most fundamental flaws. The Merdrun simply aren’t compelling. They’re just unusually nasty humans. They’re too evil to have much nuance, but too mundane to have much flavour.

There is an attempt made to add some depth to them via a new character through which we can see the Merdrun’s point of view on things, and it helps, but it doesn’t really do enough to change their fundamentally uninspiring nature.

I also continue to be disappointed by how much Maigraith has been squandered as a character. The entire Three Worlds saga has been building her up into this epic, terrifying threat, and in this series she’s just… petty and pathetic. She does get a halfway decent conclusion to her story, but overall I’d still consider her treatment in this quartet to be an incredible disappointment — perhaps the greatest error Irvine has made with this entire franchise.

In theory the most exciting part of these last two books is that (thanks to some time travel shenanigans) they bring back nearly every major protagonist from the entire Three Worlds Cycle. This should make for a really epic experience, and it has its moments, but there’s just too many characters and not enough for them to do. Many iconic figures are squandered as irrelevant cameos.

Most egregiously, Nish — arguably the greatest and most memorable hero of the saga — does literally nothing. He could have been removed from the story entirely, and nothing would have changed. He’s just… there.

On the plus side, we do get a lot more time with Xervish Flydd, who never fails to be entertaining. Gods I love that cranky old bastard.

In a vacuum, the Gates of Good and Evil is not a bad series. It’s got some definite rough edges, but I’ve read and enjoyed worse. On its own merits, it’s a decent fantasy action-adventure.

But compared to the quality of the previous entries in the Three Worlds Cycle, and considering all the potential of bringing together plots and characters from the entire saga to date, it’s hard to see it as anything but a disappointment. It pains me to say it, but it’s true. It’s not that it’s bad; it’s just that it could have been so much better.

Confusingly, the ending to book four declares it the conclusion of the Three Worlds Cycle, but Irvine has already announced his intention to write another series (albeit an interquel and thus not technically a continuation, I suppose), and one of the final chapters foreshadows the return of a major villain. So… I guess we’ll have to wait and see.