Review: The Hobbit, An Unexpected Journey

Before I begin, I should take a moment to explain the significance of Tolkien’s work in my life.

Cover art for I am a fantasy author. That means Tolkien is to me what Jesus is to Christians.

My love of the fantasy genre can be traced to my early childhood, and two things in particular. The first is Warcraft: Orcs and Humans, and the second is “The Hobbit.” My teacher read it to my class in school, and afterward, I insisted my parents obtain copies of it and “The Lord of the Rings” and read them to me ad nauseam.

The first school play I ever performed in was a production of “The Hobbit.” I donned an absolutely ridiculous plush lizard suit and played the role of the dragon Smaug — to critical acclaim, I might add.

I was not often accepted by the other children in my early years, but one of the first games I was allowed to join was them playing out “Lord of the Rings.” I got to be Gimli.

John Rhys-Davies as Gimli in The Lord of the RingsMy father, who had been working with a local carpenter at the time, crafted me a battleaxe out of wood, and my mother used a wood-burning kit to put “Gimli, Son of Gloin” onto the axe in Norse runes. I still have the axe.

Around this time, I contracted chicken pox. What followed was a week of utmost misery as my entire body became covered by burning, itching sores. The only thing that kept me sane through this was my parents reading “The Hobbit” and “Lord of the Rings” to me until they were hoarse.

Years later, Peter Jackson came out with his films of the books. I still remember my exact words as I came out of The Fellowship of the Ring: “Best. Movie. Ever.” And I meant it.

And The Two Towers was even better.

The point I’m trying to make is this: few things, fictional or real, have had a greater impact on my life than the works of Tolkien. So as you read this review, keep in mind that I am in no way an impartial observer when it comes to Middle-Earth.

A map of Middle EarthOn with the show!

The elephant in the room:

Let’s start with the obvious. Yes, they’ve turned a fairly short book into three massive films, and yes, this is a blatant attempt to milk more money from the franchise.

But I view this the same way I view Blizzard Entertainment’s decision to release Starcraft II as a trilogy of games. As long as it leads to more content, and as long as the quality of the end product remains good, I don’t care that it’s a shameless cash grab.

The effort to stretch out the story is apparent when you view this movie. This is not a quick movie, and they have played fast and loose with the exact details of the story to pad it out.

But you know what? I don’t care.

Tolkien’s world is so deep and his stories so gripping that they can stand up to this treatment. Peter Jackson may be adding more to the story than was in the books, but he’s largely just expanding on elements that were only implied or explained in brief in the books. He’s not just pulling stuff out of his ass to make a fast buck.

The official poster for The Hobbit, An Unexpected JourneyWhatever liberty’s might be taken, this is still The Hobbit at a very fundamental level. The important things are all there. Simply put…

They got it right:

That might not sound like especially strong praise, but when it comes to the works of Tolkien — and when I’m the one saying it — that’s about as high praise as could possibly be uttered.

“The Hobbit” was a very different book from its trilogy of successors, and this movie captures that. This is a very light-hearted and whimsical movie, and it seems aimed at a younger audience than the Lord of the Rings films were. Which is exactly what it should be; Tolkien wrote this book for his children.

The casting, as with the previous films, is pitch-perfect. Sir Ian McKellen isn’t good as Gandalf; he is Gandalf. Martin Freeman is excellent as Bilbo — the right mix of awkwardness, charm, and wit. I’ve always been a little iffy on Andy Serkis’ portrayal of Gollum, but he does a lovely job in this film.

But who really steals the show in this movie is Richard Armitage as Thorin Oakenshield. This man is brilliant. His portrayal of Thorin — equal parts noble heroism and frightening obsession — exactly matches how I pictured the character in the books, and every single of one of his scenes exudes gravitas.

I feel the beginnings of a mighty man-crush.

And, of course, the soundtrack, the visuals, and the action sequences are all as good as you could hope for.

That’s not to say the movie is perfect. The first half does feel a little lacking. I wouldn’t go so far as to call it boring — it does, in fact, have a lot of enjoyable moments — but it doesn’t have the same sparkle and shine as the previous films. It’s merely good, not great.

But then they got to the Goblin caves. Cue nerdgasms.

In closing:

To be honest, I’m not sure there’s a point in my posting this review. With a movie this big, I’m sure everyone has already made up their minds whether to see it or not, and pretty much everyone who will already has.

But whatever. It’s my blog. I’M YOUNG. I DO WHAT I WANT!

Anyway, to those who might still be on the fence about whether to see An Unexpected Journey (all two of you): do eet.

Overall rating: 9.1/10 SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY, JACKSON!

New Titan Theory + Review: Honor Among Thieves

Engage tinfoil:

If you’re not familiar with Project: Titan, here’s a quick rundown. Titan is the codename given to a new massively multiplayer game being developed by Blizzard Entertainment. We’re not technically supposed to know about it, but enough info was leaked that Blizzard had to acknowledge its existence.

/tinfoilBut aside from the fact it’s an MMO, we still know only a few small things about it, such as the fact that it will involve product placement and/or in-game advertisements. This means it will likely be set in the modern day or maybe a near-future sci-fi setting.

Blizzard is also on record as saying it will be a new intellectual property — IE: not Warcraft, Starcraft, or Diablo.

But a new rumor challenges this notion. This rumor states that it is not entirely a new IP but instead occupies some strange gray area where it both is and isn’t a new franchise. It’s described as a “spin-off” of a current IP.

Now, it is just a rumor, but supposedly, the source is fairly credible. (Information on the source can be found here.) If true, this may be the final clue we need to figure out what Titan is, because I can think of only one thing in all of Blizzard’s lore that would fit everything we think we know about Titan.

I think Titan is set in the Starcraft universe, but takes place on Earth.

Earth is something of a non-factor in the Starcraft universe. The UED invasion in Brood War aside, Earth has been largely forgotten by the Koprulu Sector, and after what happened to DuGalle’s fleet, it’s doubtful the people on Earth want anything to do with Koprulu.

Furthermore, everything that makes Starcraft Starcraft is intrinsically linked to the Koprulu Sector. A game set on Earth would not involve the Zerg, the Protoss, the Xel’naga, the Dominion, Raynor, Mengsk, or Kerrigan. If Blizzard is true to their own backstory, there wouldn’t even be any telepathic humans.

Thus, Titan would technically be a part of the Starcraft universe, but it would be so different that it would, for all practical purposes, be a completely new game.

Think Portal and Half-Life. Technically, both those franchises take place in the same universe, but barring a few Easter eggs, there’s almost nothing to connect them.

Titan would also be set in a future version of our world, opening up the possibility for those in-game ads and product placements. Granted, it’s a little far-fetched for corporations from our time to still be running 500 years from now, but it’s not completely implausible.

There’s also no guarantee Titan would be set at the same time as the Starcraft games. It could take place closer to our own time, perhaps even before the launch of the super-carriers. In which case telepathy would be back on the table.

Because let’s be honest: if we can’t play as Nova clones, what the Hell is the point?

A banner based on the Nova Terra character of the Starcraft universeThis leaves us with a dystopian, over-crowded Earth lorded over by a totalitarian government possessed of a fanatical belief in “human purity.” That certainly seems like a concept with a lot of potential for interesting stories and gameplay.

Food for thought, at least.

Review: Honor Amongst Thieves:

“Honor Amongst Thieves” is the final installment of David Chandler’s “Ancient Blades” trilogy. It continues the story of Malden, the witty thief; Croy, the absurdly chivalrous knight of the order of Ancient Blades; and Cythera, whose most noteworthy personality trait is that she has a vagina.

Cover art for “Honor Amongst Thieves” picks up where the last book left off, with the barbarian hordes of the east poised to invade the kingdom of Skrae. Through a series of ludicrously improbably events — even by fantasy standards — Malden finds himself with the responsibility of saving the kingdom from the onslaught.

Meanwhile, Sir Croy struggles to regain his honor by protecting Skrae’s royal family, and Cythera tries to earn the award for Most Uninspiring Heroine in a Fantasy Series.

Unfortunately, David Chandler seems to have decided to shift gears and write this book as a serious fantasy epic. This was not a good move.

“The Ancient Blades” is a series with many flaws, but its wry humor and light-hearted sense of adventure made it fairly easy to overlook them. The books never seemed to take themselves terribly seriously.

Now I’m forced to wonder if Chandler meant this to be a serious trilogy, and not a self-parody, from the start. If true… yikes.

Without the books’ trademark humor, Malden is just a cliche do-gooder, Croy is just a pompous ass, and Cythera… Well, she always sucked.

Art of Cythera from At least Cythera stopped letting her life be entirely dominated by men in this book. Instead, she let it be entirely dominated by her mother.

I don’t think Cythera has any will of her own. Maybe it’s supposed to be some commentary on her being raised as a slave, but it sure doesn’t make for interesting reading. Good characters forge their own destinies; they don’t just let themselves be led around by the nose.

The ending of the book was very weak and inconclusive, too. Very little was resolved, and all in all, it felt more like an ad for the inevitable second trilogy than anything.

“Honor Amongst Thieves” isn’t totally without its strengths. It’s still very fast-paced and action-packed, and even despite all my complaints, I still found it to be very much a page-turner.

I’ll also grudgingly admit the villain was interesting. Normally, I don’t care for villains with more brawn than brains, but this guy was so evil and nuts I just had to appreciate him.

Overall rating: 5.7/10 Not completely without merit, but largely mediocre.