Age of Empires: Campaigns and Controversy

Feeling burnt out on the online game grind after a few months of playing WoW and The First Descendant, I’ve returned to my first love, RTS games, with a special emphasis on the Age of Empires franchise.

The war god Chiyou in the Age of Mythology: Retold Immortal Pillars campaign.The crash bug in Age of Mythology: Retold finally got fixed, so I managed to finish the Immortal Pillars campaign at last. It was a pretty anticlimactic ending, made only worse by how long I waited to see it, but I do remain a big fan of the Chinese civilization, even if the campaign disappointed.

I then moved on to Ol’ Reliable, AKA Age of Empires II. My habit since the Definitive Edition’s release has more or less been to come back every few months, knock out a campaign or two, and then play something else, but even after five years and around 150 hours logged on Steam, I was still nowhere near close to finishing them all.

I decided it was time to finally admit to myself that maybe I don’t want to finish all of them. The DE DLCs have focused too much on Europe for my taste, and there’s a lot of very niche “civilizations” that I don’t think the game really needed. My enthusiasm for playing their campaigns is minimal.

So I decided to give myself permission to consider the game “finished” once I had played all the non-European campaigns,* which felt much more achievable.

A Hindustani town in Age of Empires 2's Babur campaign.*(That I currently own — I still haven’t bought the Mountain Royals DLC, though I may yet at some point.)

As of this writing I have technically completed that goal, though I may go back and play Prithviraj again. The first time I played it, it was still using the umbrella Indian civilization from before Dynasties of India, and I kind of want to play it again now that it uses the Gurjaras.

The last fully new (to me) campaign I played was Le Loi (Vietnamese), and I may have saved the best for last. It became one of my favourite Age of Empires campaigns to date. It feels like everything I want from Age of Empires on every level. A bit of history I knew nothing about, a fun underdog story about triumphing over an invading force, long missions full of multiple enemies to defeat, challenging but not unfair.

The second to last mission, A Three Pronged Attack, in particular really stood out. You get multiple bases to manage and several different objectives you can tackle in any order, so there’s a lot of freedom in how to approach the mission. It was quite challenging, and I was brought to the brink of defeat several times, but I managed to hold on. By the end I’d mined out most of the map, but I pushed through in the end. Just epic.

A mission introduction from the Le Loi campaign in Age of Empires II.The Vietnamese civilization itself isn’t my new favourite or anything, but it was enjoyable enough. Using an army composition of the new fire lancer unit combined with rattan archers made for an interestingly different economic equation, since neither costs food.

“Finishing” the campaigns doesn’t mean I’m not going to play the game anymore, of course. I’m sure I will continue to pick it back up periodically. I may still get to those remaining European campaigns, or pick up Mountain Royals. I think it might be fun to replay some of the original campaigns, too. Many of them I haven’t played in over twenty years. And of course there will be more DLCs in the future.

On that note, there’s been a lot of rustled jimmies in the community lately over the recent Three Kingdoms DLC. I’m not as enraged by it as some, but I’m probably never going to buy it, and I do tend to agree it’s a step in the wrong direction.

I’m getting really tired of “variant” civilizations. I hated them in AoE4, and I’m not happy to see the concept now creeping in to AoE2. This franchise is supposed to be about empires and civilizations, not individual armies. The world is full of so many rich and diverse cultures that could be added, but it feels like these days the developers are focused on finding new and creative ways to keep rehashing what we already have, and honestly it’s getting hard not to see it is a bit racist.

A mission from the Le Loi campaign in Age of Empires II.I don’t mean this in a “the developers are secretly MAGA” sort of way. I don’t imagine there’s any conscious malice at play. But unconscious bias exists, and it’s clear that a lot of people in our society think civilization is something that has mostly only existed in Eurasia, in part due to failings of our education systems.

Like, it’s just wrong that we now have twice as many civilizations representing the Han Chinese as we do the entire continent of Africa. We have as many civilizations from the Italian peninsula as we do all of the Americas. People regularly argue that the reason we can’t have North American native civilizations like the Haudenosaunee is because they don’t fit the game’s time frame, but we can break the game’s time frame to add three new flavours of Chinese?

Playing through the Le Loi campaign really got me thinking about how that’s more what I want to see out of these games. I’m pretty sure most of the people playing AoE2 had never even heard the name Le Loi before this campaign, but it’s a really compelling piece of history and a story worth telling.

That’s where I want to see the developers putting their resources. Exploring elements of the world’s cultures and history that haven’t already been done to death in this and other games. I want to expand my horizons.

A mission introduction from the Le Loi campaign in Age of Empires II.I also dislike that the Three Kingdoms campaign is apparently an adaptation of the fictionalized Romance of the Three Kingdoms rather than actual history, and I agree that hero units have no place in AoE2 outside the campaign (and barely even there).

So yes, Three Kingdoms is probably going to remain a no buy for me. On the plus side, since I don’t play multiplayer, I can pretty much ignore its existence entirely.

On a final and tangentially related note, I also did some looking into player made campaigns, mainly for the AoE games other than 2, which don’t have as much official single-player support.

Unfortunately, I didn’t find that much that looked interesting. I was especially hoping to find some player made AoE4 campaigns, but there don’t seem to be any, not even a single standalone scenario. I could have sworn I heard people were making such things, but apparently not. Very disappointing.

A Swedish home in the Age of Empires III Definitive Edition.The only thing I found that looked appealing was a Swedish campaign for AoE3 that looked decently high quality for unofficial content. 3 may be my least favourite AoE game, but I may get around to trying this campaign at some point. I did always like the Swedes; they don’t feel nearly as overcomplicated as most AoE3 civilizations. Plus the sod roof houses are cute.

Has the Success of AoE2 Become a Self-fulfilling Prophecy?

While I also dipped my toes into New World and Heroes of the Storm, November ended up being a month almost entirely devoted to real time strategy for me. Aside from checking out the ZeroSpace demo, I also spent quite a lot of time on the Age of Empires franchise.

A cutscene from Age of Mythology: Retold's massively disappointing Arena of the Gods mode.First, there was the release of the Arena of the Gods mode for Age of Mythology: Retold. As a reminder, this is the only new content for the remaster that isn’t paid DLC, and it was supposed to be a launch feature but got delayed.

It should have been delayed a lot more. The intention seems to have been to make something that combines the best of both skirmish and campaign play, but instead it’s the worst of both, with extra issues on top.

When we got the first preview, everyone took it to be a repeatable rogue-like style pseudo-campaign, but it’s actually exactly the same every time with no randomization or replay value at all. The “story” is paper-thin and a complete rehash of the original game’s story, and every mission is just a standard skirmish map with minor twists that rarely change how the game is played in any significant way.

The enemy AI is also woefully inadequate. It supposedly does get harder eventually, but the first dozen or so missions at least are incredibly easy, and the AI isn’t programmed to change its behaviour based on the “world twist” buffs, leading to lots of situations where you can just roll it effortlessly.

The Arena of the Gods mode in Age of Mythology: Retold.Oh, and you also can’t save mid-mission for some reason.

My expectations for Arena of the Gods were never that high, but I’m just shocked at the poor quality of it. I struggle to imagine how they could have done a worse job. I’d genuinely rather just play regular skirmishes because at least then you have full freedom to choose your civilization, opponent, and difficulty, and you can save your game if you get called away suddenly. I gave up out of sheer boredom before I even made it to the halfway point of the campaign.

Retold continues to be an incredible disappointment across the board. The Immortal Pillars expansion has now been delayed, and I can only hope the extra time pays off and they can finally deliver some quality content. So far Retold does not feel remotely worthy of the money I spent on it.

After that, my attention turned to Battle for Greece, the experimental new narrative-focused expansion for Age of Empires II.

I do think this one was a little over-hyped, especially by the community. There was so much talk about the quality of the story-telling being taken to another level, but it’s just like any other AoE2 campaign on that front. The voice acting is as hokey as ever, and the new cinematic mission intros are not meaningfully different from the old journal entries, still being mostly static images accompanied by a single narrator’s voice over.

A cutscene from the Chronicles: Battle for Greece DLC for Age of Empires II.I also think the animations themselves were pretty goofy, and it really took me out of the story. The exaggerated body proportions and limited motion kept making me think of the “virgin versus chad” memes.

The gameplay was a bit more interesting. Again, not quite as revolutionary as it was cracked up to be, but they did get a bit more creative with mission design, and there’s the naval revamp, which I think I liked. I wouldn’t go so far as to say it actually made me enjoy naval gameplay, but I did dislike it less. What was really fun was the super OP upgrades you got when playing as Themistocles, but I guess I grudgingly understand why those couldn’t be in every mission. I guess.

I did find consistency was an issue. The difficulty was all over the map, and I found some of the more “creative” missions could be more irritating than anything, especially those with limited economies. If you asked me to list my favourite AoE2 campaign missions, a lot would be from Battle for Greece, but the same would be true if you asked me to list my least favourite.

Still, it’s good to see them trying new things, and I mostly enjoyed it. I expect I’ll buy the Alexander the Great sequel they teased at the end.

A massive battle in the Chronicles: Battle for Greece DLC for Age of Empires II.Finally, the Sultans Ascend expansion for Age of Empires IV finally went on a deep enough discount that I decided to pull the trigger on it.

All the praise directed at Battle for Greece’s story-telling would have fit a lot better here. The animated cutscenes for the Sultans Ascend’s lone eight-mission campaign are absolutely gorgeous, and the narration is top notch. This was a real high water mark for story-telling in the Age of Empires franchise.

I did find the missions again suffered a bit from inconsistent difficulty and too many missions with limited economy or otherwise gimmicky design, but overall it’s a very strong campaign. I do, however, remain frustrated by its paltry size. Even at 30% off, I feel like I overpaid for what was ultimately an incredibly small amount of content.

I also tried the new civilizations, the Byzantines and the Japanese, which once again had me feeling that AoE4 is starting to repeat the mistakes of AoE3 by over-complicating its design.

An animated cutscene from the Sultans Ascend campaign in Age of Empires IV.The Byzantines in particular felt like they had enough unique gimmicks for at least two or three different civilizations. Between the aqueduct mechanic, olive oil and mercenaries, and a wealth of unique units that almost all have active abilities, it’s just too much. None of those are bad mechanics individually — aqueducts in particular are quite clever — but it’s too much for one civ. This level of asymmetry makes sense in a game with three or four factions, not a game with over ten factions.

The Japanese also felt intimidating at first due to have a roster comprised almost entirely of unique units, but it got a lot more manageable once I figured out most of them are effectively just buffed versions of standard units. I also enjoyed the bannerman mechanic and the choice of religion. It’s still a bit more complexity than I’d like in a single civilization, but it’s not too bad once you get the hang of it, and I ended up liking the Japanese overall.

It’s kind of a moot point, though, as they have no campaign content, and the skirmish AI in AoE4 remains FUBAR even after all these years. When I tried the Byzantines, the enemy seemed to keep most of its army next to its town centre for the entire game, sending out only small groups to apparently wander the map at random. Never once did my base actually get attacked. I can’t believe they still haven’t gotten the skirmish AI working at even a basic level.

I didn’t even bother with the variant civilizations. I still think the whole idea is dumb from top to bottom, and I wish the resources spent on them had gone to more campaign content instead.

A Japanese settlement in Age of Empires IV.And that brings me to the question in my headline. Age of Empires II remains the most popular AoE game, but I do wonder how much of that is a self-fulfilling prophecy at this point as it’s clear the other games are suffering from a lack of development resources.

I feel like we’re caught in a feedback loop where AoE2 gets the most resources, so it produces the most content, so people play it more, so it gets more resources… Meanwhile the other games get neglected because they never got the resources they needed to equal AoE2’s momentum.

AoE2 is a great game, but at the end of the day it’s still over twenty years old, and after playing so much of it, it is starting to feel a bit tired for me. These days I would much rather play AoE4 or AoM: Retold, but the content just isn’t there. When AoE2 offers me twenty-one campaign missions for $20 and AoE4 offers me eight missions for the same price, it’s kind of a no-brainer where I’m going to prioritize spending my money. I like AoE4 better, but I don’t like it more than twice as much.

I’m worried that the powers that be are looking at the metrics and getting the wrong message. I’m worried they’ll see that no one is playing Arena of the Gods and people mostly bought Sultans Ascend for the multiplayer content and conclude that there isn’t a desire for versus AI content outside of AoE2, but I think there very much is. I would happily sink dozens of hours into those games if content of sufficient quality and quantity was there.

A naval battle in the Chronicles: Battle for Greece DLC for Age of Empires II.But right now AoE2 is the only Age game that consistently serves my playstyle, so I’ve got no choice but to keep slinking back to it until the other titles get their act together.